Yes, I'm sure you're an audiophile, listening to that 128kbps AAC goodness you purchase off of iTunes, probably on Skullcandy earbuds, right? Or maybe people who are really concerned about the sound quality of their music just buy the CDs. Try head-fi.org or hydrogenaudio.org if you want to find forums of the actual audiophiles who spend thousands trying to get the highest possible quality sound.
As a disclaimer, I myself am not a true audiophile, but calling iTunes tracks anywhere near audiophile quality is just wrong.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Randy @ Sep 4th 2007 11:12AM
I want SUBSCRIPTION iTunes just like Rhapsody! Any news on that? This is the only reason I have not switched over to iTunes.
Killian @ Sep 4th 2007 11:23AM
that's unfortunate, you're missing out
L.M.L.Y.P @ Sep 4th 2007 1:30PM
youre not really missing out on anything. enjoy your money saving subscription, Killian seems to be missing out on his money :(
Dave A. @ Sep 4th 2007 1:32PM
Yes, because we all know how much us audiophiles love to *rent* songs.
If you really want a song, you buy it. You don't rent it. This is the only reason I have not switched over to Rhapsody/Napster/etc.
John @ Sep 4th 2007 1:39PM
Yes, I'm sure you're an audiophile, listening to that 128kbps AAC goodness you purchase off of iTunes, probably on Skullcandy earbuds, right? Or maybe people who are really concerned about the sound quality of their music just buy the CDs. Try head-fi.org or hydrogenaudio.org if you want to find forums of the actual audiophiles who spend thousands trying to get the highest possible quality sound.
As a disclaimer, I myself am not a true audiophile, but calling iTunes tracks anywhere near audiophile quality is just wrong.