Japanese scientists make breakthrough in space-based laser power
The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and Osaka University have been working together to develop a device which converts sunlight into laser-light with four times the efficiency of previous attempts. According to a report out of Tokyo, the team is working on Space-based solar power systems which can collect sunlight in space and convert it into laser light, which is then transmitted to Earth and used for electricity... or to power a massive Death-Ray. The project works by storing sunlight-based energy in plate made from a sintered powder of metals like chromium and neodymium. When weak laser light is shined onto the plate, the stored energy is transferred to the laser where its strength is amplified by a factor of four. In one test, a 0.5-watt laser was amplified to 180-watts by the plates. Scientists have thus far been able to garner 40-percent of the solar energy produced, and they hope to have a system ready for satellite mounting by the not-too-distant year 2030. Huzzah! [Warning: read link requires subscription]



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
SL @ Sep 4th 2007 2:38PM
Can't wait for the laser's beam to miss and vaporize someone's neighbourhood. Remember Simcity 2000?
Karl Viklund @ Sep 4th 2007 2:38PM
Something for Mr. Evil :)
Mike @ Sep 4th 2007 4:03PM
It's Dr. Evil. He didn't go to evil med school to be called Mr.
Woody @ Sep 4th 2007 2:44PM
Talk about self fulfilling prophecy. Has anybody seen the Japanese Anime movie Akira? Giant space based laser powered by the sun... hummmm
Hyperion2010 @ Sep 4th 2007 2:44PM
Looks like good ole asimov might have got at least something in iRobot right :D
dxchase @ Sep 4th 2007 2:51PM
And in a few hundred years, maybe we will see a Death Star!
Jack @ Sep 4th 2007 5:23PM
Ion Canon Ready...
blueeyesm @ Sep 4th 2007 2:54PM
:D
If Christian extremists made this, it could be dubbed the "Christ Cannon"
"go with God...." *ZAAP!*
Orrr...
If its manned, it could be dubbed The Watch Tower...
(manned by a tall green alien)
David @ Sep 4th 2007 3:36PM
Mate - You got problems. Thank goodness idiots like you aren't running the bloody program.
blueeyesm @ Sep 4th 2007 3:44PM
@David:
Humour w/ references. Now take a deep breath and relax.
John @ Sep 4th 2007 4:33PM
References? All I see is your weak sarcasm built from ideas, nothing at all like references.
domochan @ Sep 4th 2007 5:19PM
omg you 2, get a life and quit complaining about ppl's irrelevant post. don't reply to my post either..... assmunch
injate @ Sep 4th 2007 2:55PM
what if it hits a cloud. does the cloud explode?
oGMo @ Sep 4th 2007 3:06PM
no, cloud gets the materia then the satellite explodes
John @ Sep 4th 2007 4:35PM
Bahamut is your friend (not in Advent Children...).
Jedidiah Lau @ Sep 4th 2007 2:56PM
i
injate @ Sep 4th 2007 3:00PM
o
zach starer @ Sep 4th 2007 3:59PM
u
shaun @ Sep 4th 2007 2:58PM
I'm pretty sure austin powers 3 had a similar premise
Passarinhuu @ Sep 4th 2007 3:00PM
well, we can expect heavy ionization/dissociaton in the atmosphere...
ssuk @ Sep 4th 2007 3:07PM
MiniMe Stop humping the laser!
Xzavier @ Sep 4th 2007 3:10PM
Moonraker anyone?
Diogo @ Sep 4th 2007 3:18PM
Isn't it easier to use Solar parabolic collectors and stirling engines to create energy using parabolic dishes or solar power towers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_One) or one of the newest (though more expensive) solar cells which are capable of 42% efficiency (on the planet's surface, let alone in space, since we lose some solar power due to the atmosphere) ?
Just a thought...
Mike @ Sep 4th 2007 7:02PM
one word... night. A satellite in Lagrange 1 (stable position between Earth and Sun) could get 24 hour solar power. the laser would need to be relayed by further sattelites before reaching the ground station, due to the rotation of the Earth, and the tracking would need to be spot on. We would also need to develop a cult of humanoid robots to worship and maintain the beam.
Slvrgun @ Sep 4th 2007 3:22PM
The USA military is surely already on this one.
HineyWipe @ Sep 4th 2007 3:55PM
Spied secret space weapons info from Japanese gvt:
"ohhh, you see, we put BIG American Magnifrying grass in orbit!"
"ooooo. It cook you fast, dead ant! Go, Go, Go"
KirbyMeister @ Sep 4th 2007 4:02PM
JAPAN'S CHARGIN ITS LAZOR
OddManOut @ Sep 4th 2007 4:19PM
"It's the SOL sir!"
John @ Sep 4th 2007 4:37PM
TETSUO!!!
KANEDA!!!
(repeat many times...)
Anthony @ Sep 4th 2007 4:22PM
Finally we can bring an end to this conflict and destroy Kane's temple!
Kal-El @ Sep 4th 2007 4:28PM
Prepare the giant "laser".
Scooter @ Sep 4th 2007 4:39PM
can we get an unboxing and a hands-on review please.
randy @ Sep 4th 2007 5:06PM
Not sure how these LASERs would be any more efficient than solar heliostat arrays like STACEE.
Josh Simmons @ Sep 4th 2007 5:22PM
Danger, Will Robinson! This is pretty exciting technology, it's the stuff of science fiction.
Dorf @ Sep 4th 2007 5:23PM
What happens if you have a few sats up there and you cross the streams?
Mathew @ Sep 4th 2007 6:37PM
Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?
Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.
randy @ Sep 4th 2007 5:44PM
What happens to terrorist if I accidentally point this at him? What I'm asking is, will the smoldering zombie pieces still be edible by pigeons?
Bevon Findley @ Sep 4th 2007 6:02PM
Maybe they can finally get Osama bin laden. Bush needs to make a surprise trip to japan and ask to use it lol
Terry Thomas @ Sep 4th 2007 6:41PM
180 Watts?
The toaster in my kitchen uses more energy than that!
Someone please call Doc Brown at KLondike-54385 and tell him to keep working on his "Mr. Fusion Home Energy Converter" to get it's plutonium flux capacitor to generate 1.21 jigowatts of power.
:-)
Mike @ Sep 4th 2007 7:06PM
a 180 watt laser could probably cut you in half. Laser toaster. Theres no mention of how physically big the device is, so its not fair to be too critical at the moment.
Mike @ Sep 4th 2007 7:08PM
that should read "a laser is not equivenlent to a toaster" dam site removed my equation.
Fruition @ Sep 4th 2007 10:56PM
No, no... I like it the way it is. Clearly we need more of these so-called "Laser toasters".
But the real question is... When will the laser toaster be available for home use? I want to toast my bread with the power of lasers!
Joey @ Sep 4th 2007 6:44PM
They don't mention what wavelength or color this laser is. If its infared it won't zap houses. Might not even do that if its a visible laser beam either. 'Course if it does go off course they'd only have to put a ring of mirrors around the original target to reflect the light up to sensors to turn off the laser. But, I'm sure they'll have double, if not triple redundant systems and monitoring stations if these lasers can hurt people. As for photovoltaic cells on the planet, the clouds get in the way to often, and deserts are unstable so building there is expensive. Its probably better to put a satellite in space in the long run, not to mention unlimited realestate up there right now. Haha.
jackson @ Sep 4th 2007 8:42PM
2030???? According to Back to the future 2, we're supposed to have flying cars by 2015. Damn we suck!
Husar @ Sep 4th 2007 9:49PM
Reminds me of Die another Day...
Kevin @ Sep 4th 2007 10:22PM
the Japanese are limited from making excessive weapons like N-bombs and a so called death ray
yayikillu @ Sep 4th 2007 10:24PM
by the US
yavin @ Sep 5th 2007 4:51AM
0.5 watts * 4 = 2 watts and not 180W
not a factor of 4 but more like 360!!!!
MattC @ Sep 5th 2007 10:50AM
Where exactly do they say it multiplies the power by 4? Just curious...
yavin @ Sep 7th 2007 8:48AM
"When weak laser light is shined onto the plate, the stored energy is transferred to the laser where its strength is amplified by a factor of four."
or I am not understanding the wording correctly (in this case, please explain)