HP's new iPAQ lineup surfaces with fresh photos

Hot on the heels of those blurry, low-quality photos of the upcoming HP iPAQs, come these shiny new pics sure to have waiting fans foaming at the mouth. As you can see, the new handhelds are definitely a reality, and now we've got details on added models to the lineup, as well as rumored release information. First and foremost is the iPAQ 914 (pictured), a Windows Mobile smartphone with a 3-megapixel camera, GPS, WiFi, and HSDPA support. HP is also intro'ing the 614, another Windows Mobile device (this one presumably with a touchscreen), plus GPS, WiFi, and HSDPA -- both new phones are said to be selling for around $800. The company is also introducing the 314, a GPS navigator with custom HP software, and the iPAQ 214 and 114 ($500 / $430), two Windows Mobile-based PDAs without any phone functions (though they have WiFi, allowing for VoIP). All of the devices are said to be hitting shelves in October, save for the 914, which is due (supposedly) in November. Feel free to hit the read link for more info, though we warn you, it's in Swedish.

[Via Unwired View]

[Neeko @ Sep 5th 2007 9:39AM]

HAHA THIS LOOKS LIKE A PALM CENTRO.

[LegendZ28 @ Sep 5th 2007 9:42AM]

Haha, your CAPS key is stuck.

[doyouflip @ Sep 5th 2007 10:04AM]

I was thinking the exact same thing. Except this is a lot less horrific looking.

[dudeInAmerica @ Sep 5th 2007 9:40AM]

nice, but 800 Bones for windows mobile?

[LegendZ28 @ Sep 5th 2007 9:41AM]

Doesn't look half bad, very much business centric, but I think the feature set is nice.

[Dennis @ Sep 5th 2007 9:45AM]

It is on purpose that this is so ugly?

[NaeemTHM @ Sep 5th 2007 9:48AM]

"Ye arrive at Dennis. He wears a sporty frock coat and a long jimberjam. He paces about nervously. Obvious exits are NOT DENNIS."

[Grizz @ Sep 5th 2007 10:27AM]

I like it, when it needs to stay compact, theres only so many places you can shove stuff.

[jimmyfinch @ Sep 5th 2007 9:57PM]

GIVE TRINKET TO DENNIS

[Kamokazi @ Sep 5th 2007 9:49AM]

Woah...is that a VGA screen at true VGA resolution?!

[xman @ Sep 5th 2007 10:07AM]

HP is a little to late with this. HTC owns the windows mobile market now. And for $800? Who are they kidding? HP's quality has been crap with their last few smartphone products as well.

[Kamokazi @ Sep 5th 2007 10:11AM]

I don't know if this is still the case, but HTC at one time made the iPaqs for HP...as well as the Axims for Dell.

[xman @ Sep 5th 2007 10:55AM]

You are correct! I'm not sure if they used them for all there PDA's but the last few smartphone types were crap. 6700 6900 models I beleive.

[Chad @ Sep 5th 2007 11:30AM]

No, HTC made iPaqs for Compaq. They stopped when HP bought the brand.

[/windows mobile developer]

[John Laur @ Sep 5th 2007 11:42AM]

HTC has made iPaq's for HP. The hw6xxx series are HTC manufactured and HP branded.

[Chad @ Sep 5th 2007 12:20PM]

Sorry John, but you're wrong. HTC had nothing to do with that monstrosity. A quick Google search will show you that HP manufactured the 6300 series.

[kev @ Sep 5th 2007 10:14AM]

That "iPAQ Business Manager" kills it for me.

[hickhamt @ Sep 5th 2007 11:33AM]

actually, it says "Messenger".. not "manager".. but ya.. can you say vinyl skin! (cuz so many smartphones dont have replaceable faceplates... not that you'd take a vendor or business partner seriously if they showed up with a wm6 based smartphone sporting a faceplate with hello kitty or their favorite baseball team... but i like my treo looking at least a little different from the other 2 million of them!)

[John Laur @ Sep 5th 2007 11:42AM]

Acetone will take it off; just be gentle so you don't take the texture of the plastic with it.

[Gerald Tan @ Sep 5th 2007 10:16AM]

Somehow or rather the form factor looks too similar to the other smartphones out there. Do something.

[DJKRAZ @ Sep 5th 2007 10:19AM]

My first thought was this looks like the palm to me too. Does anyone know if there are any major differences like resolution? I know everyone at engadget has been very very down on the new palm but incredibly in love with this thing when to me they look nearly identical...

[L @ Sep 5th 2007 10:24AM]

HP, the 80's just called and wanted that calculator design back...

Honestly: *yuck*

[Grizz @ Sep 5th 2007 10:26AM]

You mess with perfection and you get Foleo

[joey @ Sep 5th 2007 10:26AM]

It could be the market they are after (possibly corporate sector) is already used to the treo/blackberry form factor. I know in my line of work everyone uses a treo/blackberry while at mediation/msc/etc... I am the only one with an HTC.

So while it might not score high with the twenty something undergrad/post market it could be that HP never intended to go into that market with this.

Again this is only a view based on my line of work where the treo/blackberry form factor owns it all. Then again in my line we still use Win XP and MS Office... Corporate America, go figure.

[Major @ Sep 5th 2007 10:29AM]

But is there any 3G support?
Battery life?

Looking for touchscreen and 3G support with more than 5 hours battery life ;-) to finally turn to the dark side..

Can Palm do it?

Other than that... looks nice [but not sleak..]

[PG @ Sep 5th 2007 10:53AM]

Looking very closely at the picture it appears that it's sporting a 3G icon. Well, I hope it does anyway, because I am a big fan of this form factor, but the current crop running WM6 Standard doesn't cut the mustard, I need WM6 Pro. The only thing that comes close is Treo 750v but a ridiculous 240 x 240 LCD, lack of HSDPA, and no Wi-Fi makes it a major pain in the ass to me.

Oh, and HP better do something about that price.

[Surur @ Sep 5th 2007 11:37AM]

It has a 320x240 Touch screen with 1.8 Mbit/sec HSDPA 3G.

It also has GPS and a 3 megapixel camera. Its as good as the HTC Tytn II (AT&T Tilt) but with a smaller screen and exposed keyboard (and if possible, a little uglier).

[John @ Sep 5th 2007 10:35AM]

WM6 6, 3 MP camera, GPS, WIFI, HSDPA. You also know that with a 2 or 4 Gb card it'll be a nice music and video player. This is like the Siemen's Fujitsu Loox that cost about the same but were never imported officially into the USA. Except for a foldable full-sized keyboard a businessperson does not need to carry around anything else.

[joe @ Sep 5th 2007 10:41AM]

the Anti-iphone, functional but ugly

[Buzzbeebara @ Sep 5th 2007 10:48AM]

Boxy =! Sexy

[Terrell @ Sep 5th 2007 10:49AM]

i would love to get one of these, but the price is crazy.

[fontendet24 @ Sep 5th 2007 10:55AM]

SO Small display!
How's anyone can read anything on this????
Just Useless.

[nswint @ Sep 5th 2007 11:22AM]

For the price of these phones I would expect them to have frontward facing cameras for video calling since they are 3G phones but that's just my expectation :-)

[dojob @ Sep 5th 2007 11:42AM]

Do you believe a human can read what's written on that screen???

[tone @ Sep 5th 2007 11:55AM]

looks like something from 1994

[dan @ Sep 5th 2007 12:13PM]

WOW Why don't the f**king companies get it through their head.
When we get a phone we want something to show off with.
Not some peice of shit that looks like it went through time travel, got lost, and got made over in the 1970's.

The iphone is popular because its sleek and sexy, Noone cares about the features those are extras.

IPOD's took over the market because they are SLEEK AND SEXY. Those other peice of shit mp3 players died out.

[PhoenixAG @ Sep 5th 2007 12:20PM]

Actually the 914 looks like it DOES have a touchscreen, as in the shot its clearly running Windows Mobile Professional (Pocket PC). Further, they have stated that the 614 and 914 have the SAME specs, which includes the OS too, I suppose.

[Joey Geraci @ Sep 5th 2007 12:58PM]

That acreen looks kinda big, and way too high resolution, to be a Windows Mobile Smartphone. You sure that isn't a touchscreen, Joshua?

[BCre8v @ Sep 5th 2007 1:09PM]

iPaq? Come on HP... that is so yesteryear. Personally, "I pack" smaller phones and would like something of this size to include a mini projector.

[Chris @ Sep 5th 2007 3:57PM]

meh :/ Looks pretty fugly to me - doesnt really do anything different to what is on the market at the moment.

[ryborg @ Sep 5th 2007 6:09PM]

I don't want to get in to an argument over the definition of 'smartphone', but this is definitely a WM6 Pro device WITH a touchscreen(notice the start menu position, the little text input panel icon bottom centre), and in Windows Mobile lingo this is a Pocket-PC phone. Windows Mobile Standard is the latest incarnation of what was formerly known as Windows Mobile Smartphone Edition.