And height, obviously. It's also the same depth (.26"). It's slightly larger in area, but that's a good thing--it's not desireable for the display or the click wheel to be smaller, IMO.
More to the point for me, it's still small enough to fit in the change pocket of my jeans. I agree pictures don't do it justice and make it look large and squat. They needed to pose it with a quarter or something.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
So true...The new nano is ugly. It's also a step in the opposite direction, and is bigger in every dimension (except capacity, I think).
It's too bad that flipping it sideways (which is what the Zune did so correctly) didn't occur to anyone at Apple.
And height, obviously. It's also the same depth (.26"). It's slightly larger in area, but that's a good thing--it's not desireable for the display or the click wheel to be smaller, IMO.
More to the point for me, it's still small enough to fit in the change pocket of my jeans. I agree pictures don't do it justice and make it look large and squat. They needed to pose it with a quarter or something.