Oh, spare me the diatribe. A CPU fits in wherever the *END USER* -- NOT YOU -- decides it fits in. Just because YOU see no need for a triple quad, as proven by your arrogant "then why bother with a triple core when a quad core exists", doesn't mean that no one else see a need.
If someone needs an additional core and can get it by a simple CPU upgrade for a minimal cost as opposed to the cost and hassle of getting a whole new motherboard as well as CPU, then there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with that. How dare you act as though your views on this matter are the only ones that someone should consider!
And nowhere did I ever say that I am against Intel. I want both AMD and Intel to do well because that will end up within innovations that will only help the consumer. In fact, this little cat-and-mouse game that they currently play is probably the best thing that can happen.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
John B @ Sep 18th 2007 10:11AM
Oh, spare me the diatribe. A CPU fits in wherever the *END USER* -- NOT YOU -- decides it fits in. Just because YOU see no need for a triple quad, as proven by your arrogant "then why bother with a triple core when a quad core exists", doesn't mean that no one else see a need.
If someone needs an additional core and can get it by a simple CPU upgrade for a minimal cost as opposed to the cost and hassle of getting a whole new motherboard as well as CPU, then there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with that. How dare you act as though your views on this matter are the only ones that someone should consider!
And nowhere did I ever say that I am against Intel. I want both AMD and Intel to do well because that will end up within innovations that will only help the consumer. In fact, this little cat-and-mouse game that they currently play is probably the best thing that can happen.