Yes, because more features always means it's better. My swiss army knife has a saw, a knife, tweezers, a magnigying glass and a ton of other crap. That doesn't meen any one of those things is any good. Come on dude, it is a chinese knock-off product, do you really think that is a good quality device? Why don't you buy one and let me know how it works out for you, I would love to hear a personal review on how great all those many features work.
P.S. I have also had products in the past that has that SRS Wow 3D sound crap, it never sounds better, it always sounds wierd. I don't know why they still put that technology into things.
tanner, it plays mp3's and has a next back button. what is their as far as crap goes. with the nano knockoffs you can argue th os, especially if you've used one (it's horrible) but this.. I don't see any reason to say it's not way better than apples shuffle.
the nano has pretty good sound and is reliable... no one on this board knows that about this player. but many Chinese knock offs have been wanting in these areas that you can't test without the device in your hand.
also i don't understand why anyone needs a display on a device that has 100 song on it... who cares? if i don't like the song playing i just press next... why do i need display? i think that is the most useless feature on an MP3 player with this capacity.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ark_v2 @ Oct 3rd 2007 4:13PM
Isn't it sad that a knock-off has more features than the real deal?
Tanner @ Oct 3rd 2007 4:21PM
Yes, because more features always means it's better. My swiss army knife has a saw, a knife, tweezers, a magnigying glass and a ton of other crap. That doesn't meen any one of those things is any good. Come on dude, it is a chinese knock-off product, do you really think that is a good quality device? Why don't you buy one and let me know how it works out for you, I would love to hear a personal review on how great all those many features work.
P.S. I have also had products in the past that has that SRS Wow 3D sound crap, it never sounds better, it always sounds wierd. I don't know why they still put that technology into things.
BrianB @ Oct 3rd 2007 4:31PM
yep, $40. Sorry Donald, my fault. I converted 1299, not 299
dj-kenpo @ Oct 3rd 2007 4:33PM
tanner, it plays mp3's and has a next back button. what is their as far as crap goes. with the nano knockoffs you can argue th os, especially if you've used one (it's horrible) but this.. I don't see any reason to say it's not way better than apples shuffle.
anonymouspimp @ Oct 3rd 2007 4:45PM
No, what's sad is that consumers are willing to pay 3X as much because it has an Apple logo on it.
doctorSpoc @ Oct 3rd 2007 4:46PM
@ dj-kenpo
the nano has pretty good sound and is reliable... no one on this board knows that about this player. but many Chinese knock offs have been wanting in these areas that you can't test without the device in your hand.
also i don't understand why anyone needs a display on a device that has 100 song on it... who cares? if i don't like the song playing i just press next... why do i need display? i think that is the most useless feature on an MP3 player with this capacity.
Constable Odo @ Oct 3rd 2007 5:15PM
But it's missing the most important features. The Apple logo and Steve's blessing. Amen, brother.