yeah, i suppose i agree with that, but it seems like sony WANTS to be a big player in the dSLR market by the number of cameras they have out/are planning on making in the next year or two, but the problem is, even though i went with the sony alpha, (partially becasue i had some minolta lenses laying around) i always feel like i maybe should have gone with canon because of their prices, and the fact that the alpha a100's noise levels are on the brink of unacceptable at high ISOs. I think you could probably get a camera of equal or better quality if you bought canon over sony, and you'd end up saving some money in the process. I love my camera but theres always the second guessing that happens after you pay THAT much for something...
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
yeah, i suppose i agree with that, but it seems like sony WANTS to be a big player in the dSLR market by the number of cameras they have out/are planning on making in the next year or two, but the problem is, even though i went with the sony alpha, (partially becasue i had some minolta lenses laying around) i always feel like i maybe should have gone with canon because of their prices, and the fact that the alpha a100's noise levels are on the brink of unacceptable at high ISOs. I think you could probably get a camera of equal or better quality if you bought canon over sony, and you'd end up saving some money in the process. I love my camera but theres always the second guessing that happens after you pay THAT much for something...