I agree with JAmerican 100%, lately corporate life seems to be taking a greater and greater hold over the average human person, systematically enslaving mankind one step at a time. I think we need to remember that as technology expands our capabilities further and further we should not only be responsible for pushing the envelope of productivity but also protecting the delicate balance/relationship between company time and personal time.
Wouldn't this law prove your point that the law is doing a good job of creating that balance? It's not like there was some stampede toward RFID implants.
I was shedding light upon the slippery slope of attempting to impose RFID on workers in the first place, while echoing JAmerican's point of the obvious lack of consideration for personal time on the part of corporations, in reference to their workforce being perceived as "cattle".
As far as the actual judgement is concerned, which was definitely not the focus of my original statement, I am in agreement with it's outcome, but remain highly aware that such a judgement has only taken place in 3 of our states and that much decision making by many people is still yet to be made before we are rid of this ridiculous proposal.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I agree with JAmerican 100%, lately corporate life seems to be taking a greater and greater hold over the average human person, systematically enslaving mankind one step at a time. I think we need to remember that as technology expands our capabilities further and further we should not only be responsible for pushing the envelope of productivity but also protecting the delicate balance/relationship between company time and personal time.
Wouldn't this law prove your point that the law is doing a good job of creating that balance? It's not like there was some stampede toward RFID implants.
I was shedding light upon the slippery slope of attempting to impose RFID on workers in the first place, while echoing JAmerican's point of the obvious lack of consideration for personal time on the part of corporations, in reference to their workforce being perceived as "cattle".
As far as the actual judgement is concerned, which was definitely not the focus of my original statement, I am in agreement with it's outcome, but remain highly aware that such a judgement has only taken place in 3 of our states and that much decision making by many people is still yet to be made before we are rid of this ridiculous proposal.