"Apparently someone needs to teach Time the difference between an invention, an innovation and a product."
Besides, it's not really an invention. It's a PDA/MP3 Player/Phone. It's like calling a bead necklace an invention because they combined beads, string, and a knot.
Hell it's just the fusion of cellular communication electronics and a phone. Nah, your right, this can't be an invention either.
But surely the phone was an invention right?
That magic phone that instantly transmits your voice to someone else. What a gas that phone is. It's not like it relies on speakers, or microphones, or some sort of input device, or materials and material processes. No, it must not be an invention then since it's just a mashup of other inventions.
But wait, is the keypad on a phone an invention? I mean humans have been pressing shit with their fingers for millions of years. Hell that's not an invention either since someone's already done it in some other fashion.
So let's see.......according to your stringent requirements, the only things you could maybe argue as inventions are subatomic particles, but even those may have shit inside of them.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
that huge iPhone in the picture is clearly an iPhone ripoff.
Apparently someone needs to teach Time the difference between an invention, an innovation and a product.
I mean cripes, I've been using YouTube since 2005. How could it be "invented" in 2006 when 1) it existed before then; 2) there was nothing invented.
Idiots.
Of course, both the iPhone & YouTube are great, highly successful products.
I thought Time Magazine went bankrupt. Does anybody actually subscribe, much less, READ that old media fossil?
And we're all expected to believe this garbage?
Next thing you know, five Swedes will give a Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore for his Power Point presentation....oh wait...
"Apparently someone needs to teach Time the difference between an invention, an innovation and a product."
Besides, it's not really an invention. It's a PDA/MP3 Player/Phone. It's like calling a bead necklace an invention because they combined beads, string, and a knot.
Would you call a cellphone an invention?
Hell it's just the fusion of cellular communication electronics and a phone. Nah, your right, this can't be an invention either.
But surely the phone was an invention right?
That magic phone that instantly transmits your voice to someone else. What a gas that phone is. It's not like it relies on speakers, or microphones, or some sort of input device, or materials and material processes. No, it must not be an invention then since it's just a mashup of other inventions.
But wait, is the keypad on a phone an invention? I mean humans have been pressing shit with their fingers for millions of years. Hell that's not an invention either since someone's already done it in some other fashion.
So let's see.......according to your stringent requirements, the only things you could maybe argue as inventions are subatomic particles, but even those may have shit inside of them.
Damn logic.