Agreed, should have been at least 720x480 16:9 EDTV. Or 640x480 "rectangle pixel" 16x9...They don't list the aspect ratio so I am assuming 4:3Why would you build anything new that was 4:3?That price blows for the resolution, at the very least the lumens should have been greater that 1000
Name
Email
Reason
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Agreed, should have been at least 720x480 16:9 EDTV. Or 640x480 "rectangle pixel" 16x9...
They don't list the aspect ratio so I am assuming 4:3
Why would you build anything new that was 4:3?
That price blows for the resolution, at the very least the lumens should have been greater that 1000