So couldn't Nokia get in trouble for initially telling everyone that their music is "free, no strings attached"? Or did Engadget jump the gun on Nokia's press release?
They are not contracts behind, and if there is a fee for that, you will have to judge it. You will go to the Nokia store, ask for a phone, they will give you a price and will tell you "by the way, it includes 1 year of free downloads of tunes (DRM'd) which you may use"...
...Then you will analize the price and say: "the price is too expensive, it must be the universal music store fee! engadget was right! this guys are trying to steal me! no way m... f...!!!"...
...Or you will say: "cool, the price is what I expected for this unlocked phone, so I will take it, and maybe will download some FREE music"
Engadget jumped the gun on Nokia's press release... for the third time in 2 days.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
So couldn't Nokia get in trouble for initially telling everyone that their music is "free, no strings attached"? Or did Engadget jump the gun on Nokia's press release?
They are not contracts behind, and if there is a fee for that, you will have to judge it. You will go to the Nokia store, ask for a phone, they will give you a price and will tell you "by the way, it includes 1 year of free downloads of tunes (DRM'd) which you may use"...
...Then you will analize the price and say: "the price is too expensive, it must be the universal music store fee! engadget was right! this guys are trying to steal me! no way m... f...!!!"...
...Or you will say: "cool, the price is what I expected for this unlocked phone, so I will take it, and maybe will download some FREE music"
Engadget jumped the gun on Nokia's press release... for the third time in 2 days.