This device is not all that bad actually. It is too pricey though. The posting about the Aleratec model is a great example.
Sure there are a lot of peeps that can find ways to automate on a linux machine for cheap. Problem is that if you are in the market for one of these products, you probably don't have the technical expertise or the time.
Technicians, Programmers, and Linux Geeks are very poor critics of products. These product lines were not made for us. Of course we could find a way to do it cheaper, faster, better. But then if we had the balls we would make a product and charge for it.
Do you want to sit there for hours doing it? Probably not. Do you want to pay some kid $7 an hour to do it for you? Most Likely.
Do you think a kid that could use the DD command on a Linux box would sit there and do it for you? Hell No.
Do you think some kid, that didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground that could just as easily be picking his nose then picking up the lettuce with same hand to put it on your whopper before wrapping it up and handing it to you, would want to sit in an air conditioned room doing it for the same wage as a crappy fast food place? Pretty Damn Good Chance.
So if I had to make hundreds or thousands of copies of USB flash drives, I would want to get a system like this.
1) No windows interface, which reduces the time it takes for the system to even recognize the drive and mount it. 2) No Linux interface, which just requires flat out skill and intelligence to operate at all.
A simple tool that any moron (including Monkeys that apparently do math better then humans now) could operate repeatedly.
I can calculate my base cost on the USB drive to be the 1) The cost of the USB stick, 2) The cost of the "Monkey", and 3) The cost of the Monkey's Tool.
I would bet that in the long run it is cheaper for me to get this product (The Aleratec) and not have to deal with it then it would be to spend a lot of time doing it myself or training some idiot to use Linux. Windows is not even a solution at all. The base cost of the hardware and license fees is going to be at least $500 anyways.
It just bugs me a bit when technical people turn their noses down at something before using their brain a little bit. That's because most technicians don't understand business, marketing, or the end users one little bit. You guys need to remember that the end user (the market) is the most stupid fucking idiot on the planet. Can barely remember to breathe. Don't believe me? Ask a buddy doing tech support in a Call Center. But do it quick, cuz every guy I knew eventually went to to tall building with an assault rifle and a scope.
As someone who does work in this industry of duplicating USB drives, I know how much it does suck to do it in Windows, and how it sucks less to do it in Linux, but it isn't the greatest.
How many of you have inserted hundreds of devices into USB ports on your computer? or USB hub? I have burnt out more USB ports on computers and entire hubs (like the $50 7-8 port hubs). It makes duplication very difficult. Also, Windows copies files slowly! A duplicator would be operating of a RISC processor and able to copy the files at a much faster rate to more devices, and being able to have more devices connected as well. We have issues with our duplication process if we plug in more than 14 USB drives (plus mouse and keyboard) because the USB bus gets severly overloaded.
We are actually looking in to getting the 60 USB port duplicator, but it is over $6K, but are leaning toward the costs being justified.
And to the above poster who said "When is the last time you saw a cd burning hub? Exactly.". You obviously have never seen a CD duplicator. They are extremely popular and have been in every office I have worked in for the last few years.
The whole line-up consists of the $60 Amps in-ears and $100 Tracks on-ear headphones, which both also come in slightly souped-up and pricier HD variations at $100 and $130, respectively.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This device is not all that bad actually. It is too pricey though. The posting about the Aleratec model is a great example.
Sure there are a lot of peeps that can find ways to automate on a linux machine for cheap. Problem is that if you are in the market for one of these products, you probably don't have the technical expertise or the time.
Technicians, Programmers, and Linux Geeks are very poor critics of products. These product lines were not made for us. Of course we could find a way to do it cheaper, faster, better. But then if we had the balls we would make a product and charge for it.
Do you want to sit there for hours doing it? Probably not. Do you want to pay some kid $7 an hour to do it for you? Most Likely.
Do you think a kid that could use the DD command on a Linux box would sit there and do it for you? Hell No.
Do you think some kid, that didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground that could just as easily be picking his nose then picking up the lettuce with same hand to put it on your whopper before wrapping it up and handing it to you, would want to sit in an air conditioned room doing it for the same wage as a crappy fast food place? Pretty Damn Good Chance.
So if I had to make hundreds or thousands of copies of USB flash drives, I would want to get a system like this.
1) No windows interface, which reduces the time it takes for the system to even recognize the drive and mount it.
2) No Linux interface, which just requires flat out skill and intelligence to operate at all.
A simple tool that any moron (including Monkeys that apparently do math better then humans now) could operate repeatedly.
I can calculate my base cost on the USB drive to be the 1) The cost of the USB stick, 2) The cost of the "Monkey", and 3) The cost of the Monkey's Tool.
I would bet that in the long run it is cheaper for me to get this product (The Aleratec) and not have to deal with it then it would be to spend a lot of time doing it myself or training some idiot to use Linux. Windows is not even a solution at all. The base cost of the hardware and license fees is going to be at least $500 anyways.
It just bugs me a bit when technical people turn their noses down at something before using their brain a little bit. That's because most technicians don't understand business, marketing, or the end users one little bit. You guys need to remember that the end user (the market) is the most stupid fucking idiot on the planet. Can barely remember to breathe. Don't believe me? Ask a buddy doing tech support in a Call Center. But do it quick, cuz every guy I knew eventually went to to tall building with an assault rifle and a scope.
As someone who does work in this industry of duplicating USB drives, I know how much it does suck to do it in Windows, and how it sucks less to do it in Linux, but it isn't the greatest.
How many of you have inserted hundreds of devices into USB ports on your computer? or USB hub? I have burnt out more USB ports on computers and entire hubs (like the $50 7-8 port hubs). It makes duplication very difficult. Also, Windows copies files slowly! A duplicator would be operating of a RISC processor and able to copy the files at a much faster rate to more devices, and being able to have more devices connected as well. We have issues with our duplication process if we plug in more than 14 USB drives (plus mouse and keyboard) because the USB bus gets severly overloaded.
We are actually looking in to getting the 60 USB port duplicator, but it is over $6K, but are leaning toward the costs being justified.
And to the above poster who said "When is the last time you saw a cd burning hub? Exactly.". You obviously have never seen a CD duplicator. They are extremely popular and have been in every office I have worked in for the last few years.