Hey, at least they aren't "widescreen." It seems like more than half the digiframes on the market are 16:9. Who the hell needs a widescreen digiframe when all your photos are 4:3? I don't want a frame that has to crop all my pictures . . . why would anyone want that? Someone please enlighten me.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Cochell @ Dec 27th 2007 6:32PM
Riddle me this Batman, why are these things so freaking expensive with such poor resolution. I dont get it.
speedyrulz8 @ Dec 27th 2007 7:04PM
Yeah, it's never made much sense to me, they aren't much more than a small low res LCD screen and a memory card reader.
R @ Dec 28th 2007 12:06PM
Hey, at least they aren't "widescreen." It seems like more than half the digiframes on the market are 16:9. Who the hell needs a widescreen digiframe when all your photos are 4:3? I don't want a frame that has to crop all my pictures . . . why would anyone want that? Someone please enlighten me.
Hannes @ Jan 2nd 2008 12:32PM
I agree with R.
Manufacturers and buyers just look on the price. If widescreen is cheaper, they buy this one and do not think a step further.
http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info