Bluetooth headset helps foil Wendy's robbery
An armed robbery at a Columbus, Ohio Wendy's restaurant on Wednesday morning was thwarted mid-progress, partly due to an employee's Bluetooth headset automatically answering a call because of the robber screaming at her to do just the opposite. We've all learned to live with the wonky voice command features in our headsets and handsets, but on this occasion it actually turned out to be a benefit, as 35-year-old Keith Allen Sturgill's screams to NOT pick up an incoming call actually opened the connection, while the parolee and his three hostages waited for the safe to unlock before customers arrived . The caller, a friend of the employee who worked at a nearby bank, heard the screaming and called police, who were eventually able to talk Sturgill into surrendering -- but not before he had "rammed the gun to his own forehead until he bled," as you can see from his mugshot. Luckily for the habitual offender, he'll soon be back in a familiar place where neither cellphones nor their many accessories will bother him for a very long time.[Via UPI]



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Richard Lai @ Dec 28th 2007 10:09AM
I'll have that Bluetooth headset for next Christmas.
Technex @ Dec 28th 2007 10:15AM
But it has wonky voice command features.
Richard Lai @ Dec 28th 2007 10:27AM
Technex: not a problem, apparently you'll just have to make your foe scream.
Wwhat @ Dec 28th 2007 3:27PM
Hmm, a headset that picks up on its own and then allows people to listen in, and you WANT that?
Rob @ Dec 28th 2007 10:11AM
hahahaha, dumbass redneck. I live in Columbus and I can tell you there's morons like that all over the place here...
Tachikomatic @ Dec 28th 2007 12:27PM
There are morons, not there is. :P
Arthur Nonamiss @ Dec 29th 2007 9:52PM
That's funny. I live in Columbus, too, and I didn't even catch that gaffe. ;)
jail meat @ Dec 28th 2007 10:13AM
Clearly you haven't been to jail, there are plenty o' cell phones in there..
mmh @ Dec 28th 2007 12:35PM
So that must mean.....
Wait, let me guess. They have internet access as well? :p
Andrew @ Dec 28th 2007 10:15AM
Dave Thomas FTW!
Anthony @ Dec 28th 2007 10:17AM
Single use cell phones (* others I imagine) are are some of the most sought after "contraband" in prisons these days (I've heard). Keith Allen Sturgill may have one sooner than you think.
Rainier @ Dec 28th 2007 10:30AM
L O S E R !!!!!
OneLove @ Dec 28th 2007 10:38AM
I can see his third eye
NovaLand @ Dec 28th 2007 11:57AM
U mean the brown and pearly white, soon to be polised by a rod?
Julius @ Dec 28th 2007 10:49AM
Speaking of crooks and cell phones
http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news/policebeat.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2007-12-27-0140.html
silverblackvoid @ Dec 28th 2007 11:21AM
bluetooth saved the day!
Nemo Throng @ Dec 28th 2007 11:35AM
Uh, duh, folks, bluetooth headsets don't answer the phone. It was the phone itself that was responding to voice commands. Duh. Could've been a wired headset or earpiece for that matter.
B @ Dec 28th 2007 12:07PM
Um... I think the headset responds to the voice commands and the phone does what the headset tells it to do. I smell troll.
MegaHurtz @ Dec 28th 2007 11:50AM
Why was the employee wearing a Bluetooth headset anyways?
Joshua Walters @ Dec 28th 2007 12:09PM
To answer her phone?
I do that all the time at work. No one really cares, and if you are at a slow point in the day, you can discreetly answer a call without anyone knowing.
Also, you can stream music through it during the day. It makes the day go alot faster.
E-Rock @ Dec 28th 2007 12:11PM
The store wasn't open yet, so probably still had it on from the drive in to work.
Jeebus @ Dec 28th 2007 12:21PM
Other things will bother him in prison though. You know what they are.
Juan @ Dec 28th 2007 1:26PM
Can you hear ne now...
Wwhat @ Dec 28th 2007 3:30PM
Clearly this guy needs counselling, and won't get it, great, see the next incident in a few years.
Roberta @ Jan 3rd 2008 6:08PM
Oh yes he will complements of the taxpayers
thatdidnthurt @ Dec 28th 2007 4:12PM
They should have let him shoot himself - one more dirt bag off the street and not wasting more of our tax dollars.
Smartypants @ Dec 28th 2007 4:58PM
>>police, who were eventually able to talk Sturgill into surrendering -- but not before he had "rammed the gun to his own forehead until he bled," as you can see from his mugshot.
Yeah! Right! LMAO!
He... hmmmm... beat himself up (and probably tasered himself too) for a good reason though - Wendy's chain of restaurants originally started in Columbus, Ohio. So it's like trying to rob a sacred place. LOL
Ed @ Dec 28th 2007 5:47PM
LOL. The speech recognition on my phone frustrates the hell out of me too. Never does what it is supposed to do when it is supposed to do it.
@Smartypants - Your sacred remarks do remind of a true story here in Las Vegas. Some perp ran into a shop and put a sawed off shotgun into the face of the owner behind the register.
The owner starts laughing. He asks the perp who put him up to this. The perp gets upset and screams at him to get all the money in a bag. The owner shocked justs points to the left of the shop where nothing less then 10 on duty police officers are as well as some off duty ones. The dumbass ran into the shop from the left side. If he had come the opposite direction he may seen the parking lot behind it with a bunch of police cruisers.
Roberta @ Jan 3rd 2008 6:08PM
talking about speech recognition on phones.. it reminds me of the movie I am Sam remember??
Zorque @ Dec 28th 2007 6:27PM
That's a hell of a mugshot.
EUboy @ Dec 28th 2007 10:50PM
test
Luis @ Dec 29th 2007 3:11AM
He looks so kind!
Richard @ Dec 29th 2007 12:05PM
Who gives a rat's arse why the employee had her headset on...the story was about the idiot that's going to get his arse ram in jail. And the Darwin award goes to...Dumb ass in Columbus Ohio!
w @ Jan 3rd 2008 2:28PM
The part that should be the issue is how a HABITUAL OFFENDER was free to obtain a gun and hold up a restaurant in the 1st place.
saltnpeppa @ Jan 3rd 2008 4:09PM
gawd that is one ugly mother fu*&er!
Darwin McDonald @ Jan 3rd 2008 4:40PM
The two words I read here was "habitual offender." If he is an habitual offender, why wasn't he already in jail???
Roberta @ Jan 3rd 2008 6:07PM
Speaking of what they are allowed, it is stupid. They get whatever they wnant, televison, weight room you name it. All complements of taxpayers. I say unless you are an endangerment to others they should all be put in the "special" facility that an police officer started (I forget where), where the prisoners wear pink clothing (including socks and underwear) and live outside in tents, and have to pay for their food (just enough food too, bologna sandwiches and such, nothing special). they don't have heat or air conditioning, some people may say that that is creul and unusual, so what at my house we don't have air or heat!
Yeah... @ Jan 3rd 2008 6:41PM
Too bad you have an internet connection, though.
Debb @ Jan 4th 2008 9:24AM
Are you guys for real? The phone itself was on auto answer...duh.