This is fail. I know its acceptable for LCD Televisions to be 32 inches large and have resolutions as low as 1366*768, but this is a photo-frame. Its meant to hold a photograph(s) to be enjoyed, looked at...thus they need resolution. This does not have a high resolution at all. Again, on an LCD TV its a non issue as its viewed from distance where the human eye does the hard work, but I'd get relatively close to a 32" photo. And see the flaw.
And a high resolution 32" panel would be rather expensive to use as a photoframe, so I'm afraid in my eyes, this has failed rather hard. It's just a crappy 32" LCDTV with a printer duct taped on the side.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This is fail. I know its acceptable for LCD Televisions to be 32 inches large and have resolutions as low as 1366*768, but this is a photo-frame. Its meant to hold a photograph(s) to be enjoyed, looked at...thus they need resolution. This does not have a high resolution at all. Again, on an LCD TV its a non issue as its viewed from distance where the human eye does the hard work, but I'd get relatively close to a 32" photo. And see the flaw.
And a high resolution 32" panel would be rather expensive to use as a photoframe, so I'm afraid in my eyes, this has failed rather hard. It's just a crappy 32" LCDTV with a printer duct taped on the side.