This is fail. I know its acceptable for LCD Televisions to be 32 inches large and have resolutions as low as 1366*768, but this is a photo-frame. Its meant to hold a photograph(s) to be enjoyed, looked at...thus they need resolution. This does not have a high resolution at all. Again, on an LCD TV its a non issue as its viewed from distance where the human eye does the hard work, but I'd get relatively close to a 32" photo. And see the flaw.
And a high resolution 32" panel would be rather expensive to use as a photoframe, so I'm afraid in my eyes, this has failed rather hard. It's just a crappy 32" LCDTV with a printer duct taped on the side.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Andrew @ Jan 3rd 2008 6:16AM
This is fail. I know its acceptable for LCD Televisions to be 32 inches large and have resolutions as low as 1366*768, but this is a photo-frame. Its meant to hold a photograph(s) to be enjoyed, looked at...thus they need resolution. This does not have a high resolution at all. Again, on an LCD TV its a non issue as its viewed from distance where the human eye does the hard work, but I'd get relatively close to a 32" photo. And see the flaw.
And a high resolution 32" panel would be rather expensive to use as a photoframe, so I'm afraid in my eyes, this has failed rather hard. It's just a crappy 32" LCDTV with a printer duct taped on the side.