Why 5GHz, wouldn't the lower frequency of 2.5GHz (or should that be 2.4GHz?) travel farther, go through objects better and also be less susceptible to metal and dense objects but a 5GHz signal wouldn't?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Why 5GHz, wouldn't the lower frequency of 2.5GHz (or should that be 2.4GHz?) travel farther, go through objects better and also be less susceptible to metal and dense objects but a 5GHz signal wouldn't?