Honestly, it looked a little choppy in the video - I'm not really impressed. You'd think they'd put some real hardware to back up such a gorgeous screen. Why only 2880x900, by the way? Wouldn't the equivalent of 2-24'' monitors be 3840x1200?
Still, cool. Its an interesting thought that we might be moving BACK to the big-booty days of CRT monitors and away from slim LCD screens.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Taylor @ Jan 7th 2008 1:23AM
Honestly, it looked a little choppy in the video - I'm not really impressed. You'd think they'd put some real hardware to back up such a gorgeous screen. Why only 2880x900, by the way? Wouldn't the equivalent of 2-24'' monitors be 3840x1200?
Still, cool. Its an interesting thought that we might be moving BACK to the big-booty days of CRT monitors and away from slim LCD screens.
http://taylorwilsdon.com
Will @ Jan 7th 2008 1:46AM
1440x900 is a fairly common resolution.