Honestly, it looked a little choppy in the video - I'm not really impressed. You'd think they'd put some real hardware to back up such a gorgeous screen. Why only 2880x900, by the way? Wouldn't the equivalent of 2-24'' monitors be 3840x1200?
Still, cool. Its an interesting thought that we might be moving BACK to the big-booty days of CRT monitors and away from slim LCD screens.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Honestly, it looked a little choppy in the video - I'm not really impressed. You'd think they'd put some real hardware to back up such a gorgeous screen. Why only 2880x900, by the way? Wouldn't the equivalent of 2-24'' monitors be 3840x1200?
Still, cool. Its an interesting thought that we might be moving BACK to the big-booty days of CRT monitors and away from slim LCD screens.
http://taylorwilsdon.com
1440x900 is a fairly common resolution.