I never understand these manufacturers. Why do they make 800:400 resolution photo frames? That ratio of 5:3 just does not make sense when most DSLRs use 3:2 and handheld autos use 4:3 (like the 800:600 and 640:480 frames). What good is a 800:400 frame when you either get a horrible cropping or pixel padding on the edges?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I never understand these manufacturers. Why do they make 800:400 resolution photo frames? That ratio of 5:3 just does not make sense when most DSLRs use 3:2 and handheld autos use 4:3 (like the 800:600 and 640:480 frames). What good is a 800:400 frame when you either get a horrible cropping or pixel padding on the edges?
Whoops. I meant to say 800x480 = 5:3 ratio (and not 800x400).