Hands-on with JVC's "thinnest" LCD

JVC's "thinnest" LCD (if you only count screens with an integrated tuner) was also on display at their showroom and of course we've got the pics. This might not be a nearly cellphone-thin 9mm screen, but its still pretty skinny and probably a lot more likely to hang on your wall than some of the prototypes we've seen at CES this year.

JVC's "Thinnest" LCD

[(Unverified) Posted Jan 8th 2008 9:25PM]

Wo, it's thin enough to bite!

1st. Whatever.

[(Unverified) Posted Jan 8th 2008 10:42PM]

This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.

[cycomachead Posted Jan 8th 2008 10:43PM]

This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.

[cycomachead Posted Jan 8th 2008 10:43PM]

This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.

[cycomachead Posted Jan 8th 2008 10:43PM]

This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.

[(Unverified) Posted Jan 9th 2008 7:53AM]

Whats the point of thinner TVs? They all are either wall mounted or on a stand. Either way a a "Phat" and a "Slim" will take up exactly the same space.

I'd prefer them to concentrate on higher contrast ratio, or somthing else useful

[(Unverified) Posted Jan 9th 2008 7:54AM]

Whats the point of thinner TVs? They all are either wall mounted or on a stand. Either way a a "Phat" and a "Slim" will take up exactly the same space.

I'd prefer them to concentrate on higher contrast ratio, or somthing else useful

[(Unverified) Posted Jan 9th 2008 7:54AM]

Whats the point of thinner TVs? They all are either wall mounted or on a stand. Either way a a "Phat" and a "Slim" will take up exactly the same space.

I'd prefer them to concentrate on higher contrast ratio, or somthing else useful