JVC's "
thinnest" LCD (if you only count screens with an integrated tuner) was also on display at their showroom and of course we've got the pics. This might not be a nearly cellphone-thin
9mm screen, but its still pretty skinny and probably a lot more likely to hang on your wall than some of the prototypes we've seen at CES this year.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
PenaltyKillah @ Jan 8th 2008 9:25PM
Wo, it's thin enough to bite!
1st. Whatever.
Cycomachead @ Jan 8th 2008 10:42PM
This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.
Cycomachead @ Jan 8th 2008 10:43PM
This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.
Cycomachead @ Jan 8th 2008 10:43PM
This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.
Cycomachead @ Jan 8th 2008 10:43PM
This years TVs seem to be thin but personally under 3-4 inches is thing enough. I care more about a thin bezel. That was I could fit a 46" where I would be able to fit a 42". I'd rather have more screen in the same space. There are some panels out there, but more selection would be better.
James Ollier @ Jan 9th 2008 7:53AM
Whats the point of thinner TVs? They all are either wall mounted or on a stand. Either way a a "Phat" and a "Slim" will take up exactly the same space.
I'd prefer them to concentrate on higher contrast ratio, or somthing else useful
James Ollier @ Jan 9th 2008 7:54AM
Whats the point of thinner TVs? They all are either wall mounted or on a stand. Either way a a "Phat" and a "Slim" will take up exactly the same space.
I'd prefer them to concentrate on higher contrast ratio, or somthing else useful
James Ollier @ Jan 9th 2008 7:54AM
Whats the point of thinner TVs? They all are either wall mounted or on a stand. Either way a a "Phat" and a "Slim" will take up exactly the same space.
I'd prefer them to concentrate on higher contrast ratio, or somthing else useful