USB 3.0 in the flesh


A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Real help in plugging USB 2.0 connectors:
Close your eyes and let your fingers do the work. The logo on most plugs in larger or only on the "top" or "front" - once you get one right on a given hub, PC, or laptop, the rest will be the same.
Lining them up straight with the jack is another issue I cannot help with, since we often find ourselves reaching around to plug in from the back under a customer's desk with a PC on it's side.
Dell monitor manufacturers take note: the worst thing you ever did was make all yours backwards in relation to the rest of the world. If you get that right on newer monitor models that will be the new worst thing ever when only some Dell monitors are backwards. Please leave them all wrong so we can learn it.
USB 3.0 backwards compatability and "keyed" connectors. hmmmm, How can we make the old plugs still fit while the new ones more obviously one way at the same time? Maybe that's the only thing they estimate will take till 2010 to figure out.
On Brute speed and firewire 3.2Gb vs USB 4.8Gb: eSATA 3Gb ("They" prefer 300 MB as more accurate name, blah, blah) is already on the shelves with a "real upgrade path" to 6Gb (600MB).
My best guess is your 2009 laptop will have all three standards, some in pre- or betaversion, and the version 3.8.63.2010 spec pre-N draft wireless built in as well.
The gadget king-bus is dead, long live the gadget king-bus.
One day we'll have the technology to develop connectors which don't have a right side up.
Why can't someone make a connector that fits no matter which way you stick it in? I know, to be backwards compatible USB 3 needs to be bass-ackwards as well. But COME ON.
Magsafe
Banana plugs.
So this might be a stupid question but the diagrams show A and B versions of USB3 plugs but they are physically the exact same height and width, they just have a slightly different shape. From the looks of it, a B plug would still fit in an A port but not the other way around. Is there any reason to do this? I'm hoping there is a good reason to create two versions that are so close together yet not completely compatible. Can anyone tell me why?
The future... is blue.
God, this is exactly what Eiffel 65 meant in "Blue (Da Ba Dee)".
The future... is blue.
God, this is exactly what Eiffel 65 meant in "Blue (Da Ba Dee)".
I would like to see magnetic connectors that plug themselves in. So you could, in theory, throw a cord in the general direction of the port and it just attaches to one of the ports.
If they don't make this a reality I will design a whole race of attack kittens and launch them onto the developers.