Explay announces new oio companion LED nanoprojector

We've already seen plenty of oio iterations from Explay, but apparently this here "oio companion" is the real deal, and it'll be shown off at Mobile World Congress next week. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean we're getting any solid price or release details just yet, pretty much this new render is all. The mobile nanoprojector uses hybrid laser and LED light sources, and features an "always in focus" capability, low power consumption and an "affordable price." According to Explay, customers and carriers are currently being polled for input on the commercial rollout, so be sure to let Explay know in the comments how excellent of a pricepoint $5 would be. You can thank us later, Explay.

[aeo @ Feb 7th 2008 11:02AM]

I'd buy THAT for a dollar!

[joeroddis @ Feb 7th 2008 6:15PM]

Aha i've just finished watching robocop :)

[SimonRichards @ Feb 7th 2008 11:17AM]

Heck, I might even pay £10 for this!

Actually, make that £5...

Or £1...

Or free, delivered to my door. :D

[Jeff @ Feb 7th 2008 2:25PM]

That's one of the least "rendery" looking render... i could be convinced that it actually exists.

I don't really see the point to this, until can fit inside a cellphone, that is. even then it seems a bit like a gimmick without much real-world use.

[B.C. @ Feb 7th 2008 2:34PM]

Mitsubishi's LED pk Pocket projector was around $400. Since this is around half the size; so that means it should half the price, right?...

[billgrove @ Feb 7th 2008 4:36PM]

yeah. Half the size means DOUBLE the price. Basic rule of electronics! :)

[Ryan Worrell @ Feb 7th 2008 2:50PM]

I'd pay $50. Honestly.

[Jerome @ Feb 7th 2008 6:19PM]

Come on guys!

you are totally not serious!

If I look back to protoype images, I would pay 180$ This might be in the 500$ and
+ price range.

This can be very useful for a laptop when you work in team!

Can't wait to see videos and pictures of the working product.

[MichaelP @ Feb 7th 2008 6:25PM]

Don't know if I'd pay $5 for QVGA...OK, I'd pay $5 for QVGA because I'm a gadget addict... But I'd really rather have 1152x720 (720p HDTV) or a more traditional 1280x1024 for my $5.

I'd probably settle for a useable 1024x768 for some uses, and I might go $50 at that resolution (and at least 36" diagonal); it would be handy for places I want a display without taking up space or putting a display in danger - like next to the stove or sink - watching low-res TV while getting supper ready or looking up recipes online. The ability to have a relatively small size at decent distance (24" diagonal at 84" distance) would make the device handy for such situations.

That brings up a point: no specs are given, either in resolution or min/max size. Well, if it's cheap enough, doesn't matter as much.

[DJM @ Feb 8th 2008 3:20PM]

I would pay £50 for that!

[wendyju @ Feb 13th 2008 12:06AM]

I really like this oio nano projector as it is more useful and convenient for business people when they are travelling. Of course, it also can link with camera to show your beautiful picture easily! I am sure it has big market! Our company is interested in buy this technology and OEM for Explay or as Explay's agent to explore China and Asia market for Explay!
Unfortunately, I didn't Explay's contact person information till now though I spent more than 4 weeks to try finding it.
Who can help me to provide useful contact information of Explay? Please send me email: [e-mail].
Thank you in advance!

Wendy

[wendyju @ Feb 13th 2008 12:11AM]

I really like this oio nano projector as it is more useful and convenient for business people when they are travelling. Of course, it also can link with camera to show your beautiful picture easily! I am sure it has big market! Our company is interested in buy this technology and OEM for Explay or as Explay's agent to explore China and Asia market for Explay!
Unfortunately, I didn't Explay's contact person information till now though I spent more than 4 weeks to try finding it.
Who can help me to provide useful contact information of Explay? Please send me email: [e-mail].
Thank you in advance!

Wendy