No. Solar power is still a shitty, expensive and pretty much a waste of money when it comes to power distribution. Not only does it have a low power output per unit area, factor in the extreme cost of the plant, the high maintenance costs and the fact that it basically only works for 12 hours a day and you'll see what I mean.
If "green power" or whatever you hippies are after, nuclear power and hydro is the way to go. Just because you hear Arizona doesn't mean that the place is devoid of sufficient water. Remember Hoover Dam?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jesus_Christ @ Feb 26th 2008 7:53AM
No. Solar power is still a shitty, expensive and pretty much a waste of money when it comes to power distribution. Not only does it have a low power output per unit area, factor in the extreme cost of the plant, the high maintenance costs and the fact that it basically only works for 12 hours a day and you'll see what I mean.
If "green power" or whatever you hippies are after, nuclear power and hydro is the way to go. Just because you hear Arizona doesn't mean that the place is devoid of sufficient water. Remember Hoover Dam?