Skip to Content
Designed for XP but Vista Capable...?its like the Designed for Mac OSX but only works on 10.5.1 or whateever
It's either:(a) The peeps at MS made a typo, and written "capable" instead of "copable."(b) It is a deliberate cheap shot ala "Planned Obsolescence" thing.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Macha88 @ Feb 27th 2008 12:03PM
Designed for XP but Vista Capable...?
its like the Designed for Mac OSX but only works on 10.5.1 or whateever
Aguiluz @ Feb 27th 2008 3:42PM
It's either:
(a) The peeps at MS made a typo, and written "capable" instead of "copable."
(b) It is a deliberate cheap shot ala "Planned Obsolescence" thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence