Military Turing test to make autonomous war robots legal?
By Darren Murph 
posted February 29th 2008 9:11AM
posted February 29th 2008 9:11AM
posted February 29th 2008 9:11AM
A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Ermmmmm.
That robo looks quite lethal :-(
Twin Drum fed MP5 SMG's
Start running now!!!
They're not MP5's. Try the AA12 Automatic Shotgun—watch your face...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atchisson_Assault_Shotgun
That's actually a new prototype weapon called the AA-12- it's a fully automatic, almost recoilless shotgun. Wouldn't want to be in the way of that one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhstuvzMiB0
Pretty sure it's not a prototype anymore...
It has I Robot written on it. Facetious, much?
Put the vacuum on the bottom of it and I'm buying one.
iRobot - the same company that builds robots to clean your house also builds robots for military uses.
Once they have a civilian version of this - probably in Hello Kitty pink (http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/17/hello-kitty-ar-15-assault-rifle-makes-you-wish-it-was-photoshopp/) - expect to see them trundling around the Arizona State campus http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0216guns0216.html
Ironically that's the exact gun I'm working on getting 150 kills with in COD4 right now (MP5)
The Turing test is far from scientific law. There are a ton of legitimate counterarguments to it, some of which were provided by Turing himself. This is not a good idea.
"As it stands, 'weapons intrinsically incapable of distinguishing between civilian and military targets are illegal'"
As it stands, torture's illegal too....and, well....you know....
(just sayin')
I for one welcome our disturbingly ED-209-like overlords.
The army has obviously never watched RoboCop.
Are you kidding? This is a SkyNet minion, all the way.
Don't you mean "The army has obviously closely watched RoboCop"?
You're right. Here I was thinking that the army can tell the difference between a good idea and a bad one. Maybe they should watch some Animaniacs instead.
It is kind of cute in a 'I'm going to blow your face off' way.
Wall-E Part 2: The Rise of the Machines
Let's see an autonomous machine tell the difference between a human and a mannequin, especially in, say, a smokey environment.
New produict!
Think this thing can see from its side? Couple diversionary tactics, good rifle, dead machine.
Easy: thermal motion sensor
A Robot COULD tell the difference between a Manequin and a Human being...
its called an INFRA RED SENSOR.
A robot could also have night vision, magnetic resonance imaging and microwave vision.
A robot could determine the threat level of a "weapon" before shooting much faster than a human could. This way, it could tell the difference between a kid holding a watergun and a kid holding an AK-47 (note to parents, if your kid has an AK 47, he is gonna get LIT UP...that is unless the robot has "targeting denied" programming to prevent it from shooting targets shorter than 5'5)
So train dogs to run up to robots.
Boom.
Dead machine.
Oh!
Robots know dogs!
Okay...cats.
Oh!
Robots know cats!
Okay, pigeons.
Oh!
Dead machine.
Sweet!, i'm 5'4" so it looks like i'm going on a rampage when these things come out.
If they go bad, we just have to get them into space, then we can shoot them all down with SM-3s. Seriously, what are you guys worried about?
Do robots know midgets? I think there's a serious loophole here. Midget soldiers will be the way to go. All they'll have to do is paint the tips of their guns bright red.
Remember that invisible border post not so long ago?
Robot: "Green card"
Border Jumper: "No habla"
Robot: *pop* *pop* *pop* *pop* *pop* *pop* *click* *click*
What truly worries me is that the US government will take your humor seriously
That invisible border post made me think of that online hunting story a few months back. I thought why don't they just combine the two. Maybe we could have Call of Duty 5 Border Patrol. Instead of paying billions for a invisible fence that doesn't work have online hunting. The system would pay for itself in no time.
@eli 05
So what about all the frickin team killers?
Someone needs to read Screamers by Philip K Dick before letting robots fight the wars.
"Anything that moves is VC; anything that doesn't move is well-disciplined VC!"
- Full Metal Jacket
It seems to me that some human combatants in the modern field of war would fail this test.
I like automated robotic sentries because someday they will be able to kill without fear and without malice.
You can't accuse a robot of being a racist.
That is... unless robots become self aware and decide that humanity is beneath them.
And without a conscience. May you fall heard-on into a wood chipper.
You know what I see in the future? "Dude don't taze me, taze-bot!" There is no reasoning with Taze-Bot.
Ha, I was going to make the same reference, but I was going to go with "Dude, don't taze me robro!"
I'd like to taze you both right now.
or dont taze me Bro-bot
Judgment Day will soon come when SkyNet takes over.
And here I thought: the next-gen Elmos are going to exterminate humanity.
So in the future the country with the best robots wins the wars....
Start studying your Japanese.
sweet, all my years of mechassault will pay off in the future of warfare
Why bother learning japanese? Telling an evangelion to stop won't do much.
(apologies to bob s above)
Wall*E, noooooo!
I mean, Number 5, noooooo!
I mean, Artoo, put your clothes back on.
Chris Elliot a.k.a Cabin Boy?
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2187630848/tt0109361
Man, oh man, I hate those fancy lads!
It doesn't look too big, have they thought about the stair issues?.
Plus can the guns move up and down as otherwised a big rock would get in its line of sight.
Who designed this? wonder how much it cost them to strap a pair of guns to a set of treads. (personally i reckon it was last years scrapheap challenge winners)
I agree with emailtabs. I mean seriously, it sure looks like a Logitech webcam that's duct-taped to the front of the thing. Gee, I sure hope no insurgents know how to unplug a USB cable.
Given the civilian deaths in Iraq...you'd have to wonder about the distinction you introduce in the 2nd paragraph.
*uggh!?*... but... I... was holding... a... cameraaaaaaa....?
Autonomous killing machines may be considered illegal, but a "remote control" killing machine is NOT autonomous. Not saying either is a good thing, just clearing up some confusion in the post. It seems to be suggesting somebody's decided it is legal, or to ignore the fact that it isn't. "Remote control" and "autonomous" are very different things.
Hey enblahget, autonomous robots WILL STILL BE ILLEGAL regardless of this "turning test". Even a 12 year old can figure out the reason why these robots are illegal is because they can't distinguish between a 2month old and an old lady, not because of friendly fire.
Sending this into a warzone where there are civilians would clearly constitute a war crime. It would be like sending a group of solders into an area knowing they will kill every living thing thats not a home solider.
Please find better writers/editors because the quality is on this site is starting to take a nose dive.