Skip to Content
Clearly in his SITES?! Come on.
sights. as in gun sights. as in what you aim with. you do aim, don't you?
Me fail english?! That's unpossible!
Magnalus-The 'paid writer' of the item you cited is perfectly right in saying "sight." Why the libelous indictment?
Because the article said "sites" before, not "sights".
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Magnulus @ Mar 10th 2008 7:10AM
Clearly in his SITES?! Come on.
a @ Mar 10th 2008 8:28AM
sights. as in gun sights. as in what you aim with. you do aim, don't you?
Dan S. @ Mar 10th 2008 9:24AM
Me fail english?! That's unpossible!
Stephen @ Mar 10th 2008 1:18PM
Magnalus-
The 'paid writer' of the item you cited is perfectly right in saying "sight." Why the libelous indictment?
Magnulus @ Mar 10th 2008 1:28PM
Because the article said "sites" before, not "sights".