er... if this *doesn't have a browser* ...then how exactly is it "one of the easier ways" to watch youtube on a tv?wouldn't it be really difficult to watch youtube videos if you had no way of finding them? (or worse, were expected to download .flv files?)Also, my prediction is that flash video become irrelevant before this "carves out a niche"
Name
Email
Reason
That's what they all said!The developer knew something they didn't.http://xkcd.com/208/
...i don't get how that xkcd comic is relevant (or, really, even what your comment means...)but i DO love xkcd, so i guess that's something. :)
Youtube has RSS feeds, which helps in retrieving the correct file. If you can't use the RSS Feeds, you can still use regular expressions.
...that's my point: that hardly seems like "one of the easier ways to watch youtube videos on your TV":)
Well, it will obviously just read the rss feeds and have its own interface to search/browse. Doesn't require an html renderer.
oh... we're defining "browser" as "HTML rendering engine"?i was assuming we were using the term "browser" to mean "some sort of interface for browsing"..."its own interface to search/browse" sounds kind of like a browser to me. :)
Usually when someone says "web browser" they mean a way to navigate an html rendering system.
"We're not sure how [it] accesses YouTube content without a browser"no one ever said "web browser" - they didn't even say "Site" but rather, "content"i don't know why we're still talking about this.
Yeah, sorry. /me was wrong. :P
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
er... if this *doesn't have a browser* ...then how exactly is it "one of the easier ways" to watch youtube on a tv?
wouldn't it be really difficult to watch youtube videos if you had no way of finding them? (or worse, were expected to download .flv files?)
Also, my prediction is that flash video become irrelevant before this "carves out a niche"
That's what they all said!
The developer knew something they didn't.
http://xkcd.com/208/
...i don't get how that xkcd comic is relevant (or, really, even what your comment means...)
but i DO love xkcd, so i guess that's something. :)
Youtube has RSS feeds, which helps in retrieving the correct file. If you can't use the RSS Feeds, you can still use regular expressions.
...that's my point: that hardly seems like "one of the easier ways to watch youtube videos on your TV"
:)
Well, it will obviously just read the rss feeds and have its own interface to search/browse. Doesn't require an html renderer.
oh... we're defining "browser" as "HTML rendering engine"?
i was assuming we were using the term "browser" to mean "some sort of interface for browsing"
..."its own interface to search/browse" sounds kind of like a browser to me. :)
Usually when someone says "web browser" they mean a way to navigate an html rendering system.
"We're not sure how [it] accesses YouTube content without a browser"
no one ever said "web browser" - they didn't even say "Site" but rather, "content"
i don't know why we're still talking about this.
Yeah, sorry. /me was wrong. :P