All the Ps are misleading. P2P is short for P to P, the 2 has nothing to do with the number of Ps. That would be redundant as they are both written out, just as you don't write WWW3 (a type of RAS Syndrome).
So P4P is short for PPP for P2P, which makes sense. I didn't like it at first, but I think they've got it spot on.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
The Angry Intern @ Mar 14th 2008 9:53AM
"Proactive network Provider Participation for P2P"
shouldn't that be P5P?
Wolfticket @ Mar 14th 2008 1:17PM
4 = for
maybe
Harbinger @ Mar 14th 2008 1:35PM
They're only counting the first p of each word, else it'd be P6P.
nh @ Mar 15th 2008 10:10AM
All the Ps are misleading. P2P is short for P to P, the 2 has nothing to do with the number of Ps. That would be redundant as they are both written out, just as you don't write WWW3 (a type of RAS Syndrome).
So P4P is short for PPP for P2P, which makes sense. I didn't like it at first, but I think they've got it spot on.