Skip to Content
Sure, AMD does have native quad four already but only on 65-nm, right? I believe 45-nm is impressive because its virtually impossible to do using SiO2... so Intel have changed the process to use Hafnium instead.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Scott Equine @ Mar 18th 2008 8:52AM
Sure, AMD does have native quad four already but only on 65-nm, right? I believe 45-nm is impressive because its virtually impossible to do using SiO2... so Intel have changed the process to use Hafnium instead.