Sony XEL-1 hands-on
By Darren Murph 
posted Mar 18th 2008 11:44PM
posted Mar 18th 2008 11:44PM
posted Mar 18th 2008 11:44PM
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
WOW! Never thought I'd see the day a monitor would be thinner than my phone. LOL
http://www.ecojoes.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/old_school_cellphone.jpg
Me neither... *sigh*
they have these on display at the sonystyle store in Houston, and they were playing disney's "Cars" from a blu-ray player.
regardless of the resolution, the picture quality was sick.
Had a chance seeing it at a Sony store today. I am totally impressed!!! Time to bring in 30+ inch OLED!!
its a nice looking TV and all but for something that pretty, the remote it comes with is as ugly as hell
i think it's cool in a futuristic-80's kind of way :)
too small to be used as a TV, but can you use it as a computer monitor? I think so, correst me if Im wrong, get the DVI into HDMI plug, and ur set to go...or buy a nVidia 9800 GX2 and hook it up HDMI to HDMI...am i right?
It only has a res of 960 x 540. :(
So...too small to be used as a TV, too low res for a PC. *What* is this thing supposed to be for again?
cant they change that with firmware updates?
itsnotabigtruck: It is supposed to be for demonstrating that OLED on bigger-than-chinese-mp4 screens is real and can kick a$$es, not really meant to be bought by mere mortals just yet
I guess I could imagine it being mounted in a kitchen or other nook for watching the news or something casual-ehh, it's base is actually too big for that...ok, it's ridiculously expensive and entirely impractical. It's Sony's way of saying to the world, "Yes World, I can make a normal, TV-sized OLED, semi-mass produce it, stick it in a box, and sell it to people". One of those angsty teen things-it doesn't have to make sense.
It helps rich people to feel good about themselves.
The one Samsung made in 14 inch is 1080P, so it can be done. It is just Sony that decided not to make it HD.
Cool! What about some pictures of it in action?
That is really slick. To bad that big base makes the slim screen kinda pointless.
thats what i've been thinking all along. whats the point if it has the same footprint as a crt.
Welcome to the brotherhood guys. I made the same comment about this baby last year and I instantly got neged. Like I have said in the past I'm in no way impressed by this device. It's not difficult to make an ultra thin telly if you stuff all the electronics in an external box, heck the screen on my laptop is thin like crazy as well.
It's all really nothing but a marketing gimmick somewhat like the Macbook Air. There only remarkable aspect of this screen is the OLED technology.
Despite of the oversized base Sony opted for a 16v input necessitating another power brick. poor form.
right on, brotherhood of naysayers. I'm with you here. The base looks like an 80's VCR. I think it's all smoke and mirrors. Sony is busy telling us to look at the thin screen, and people are not noticing the ugly fat base (to which the necessary components have been relocated). Sorta reminds me of a laptop - very thin screen attached to a base containing all the magic.
The Ethernet port is for the Internet Video Link Sony has been pushing for lately.
Did you even read what it said on the box? It says "Internet Video Link" You can't miss it.
http://www.engadget.com/photos/sony-xel-1-hands-on/706050/
Blah Never mind. I skipped the "Sans".
My Apologies ^^.
.... Why doesn't say Internet Video Link if it doesn't have an Ethernet port? Wtf?
Great to be able to make something thin for the sake of being thin, but now make it fat and get rid of that god-awful stand. Please!!
Anyone else notice Engadget en espanol has no comments in their posts.
Also, engadget's old logo had a picture of a PowerBook Titanium. That would explain the Apple following. LOL
Engadget in Spanish sucks - no offense, that's really where I should be, but it's sooo behind engadget in English
TRANSLATED IN ENGLISH (by Google) and slightly edited for proper grammar by myself:
Today we received our TV XEL-1 Sony, and it is thin. We had already talked about the characteristics, and to say that it has a width of 3mm can be impressive, but even more so when it is seen in person. It has a 11-inch screen with 960 x 540 resolution, 2 HDMI inputs, a USB port (for service), a slot for Memory Sticks, and entry for coaxial cable. We were supposed to have a Ethernet connector, but ours lacked one. In short, so that you are not bored with more words, look at these exquisite pictures in our gallery.
I saw one of these today at the Sony Style store, and it is a very nice screen. This is THIN guys. I used to own a VZ90, which had a OLED screen, and they are amazing technology.
monitor=display
phone= display+battery+other processor junk
I'd see it.
Remember first generation plasma TV? At the time they were the ultimate in cool, but by today's HDTV standards, they really lack what is desired: Longevity, cost, size, resolution, colour, contrast, etc. As with any first generation product, it's advised you not be an early adopter and wait for the technology and cost to improve simultaneously. In 6 years you will have an OLED that is cheaper, bigger, and better than the puny little XEL-1.
They've had this at the sony store in Austin for a while. I always figured it's been on sale for a while, since it had a price tag by it.
Is this the first guy to actually buy one?
When they start putting these screens in laptops, give me a call...
Who put that nice screen on my old alarm clock?
ben heck
My coworker got one as a wedding present recently - we work on organic electronics, so its a self-investment if you like - anyhow... yeah, its kinda neat and kinda cheezy in equal measure. The really vivid colors, uber-thinnness, and 180 degree viewing angle are the good points. Unfortunately its really too small to be of any practical use as a TV, unless you have it on a desk you are somehow sitting at (working?) and watching TV at the same time...
Those with long memories may remember that the first LCD TVs were 7 or 8 in models with horrible picture quality. Unfortunately for OLED that was then and this is now.
Here's the Babelfish translation of Sony Japan's product page:
http://www.jp.sonystyle.com/Style-e/Product/Tv/Organic/XEL1/
The Ethernet port got the boot in non-Japanese models in favor of a second HDMI. So stop looking for one.
There are a few other differences, mainly dealing with TV tuners. It's been a while since I had my hands on the Japanese model, so I've forgotten the details.
I've actually seen this monitor and its small but probably the best looking quality I have seen out of any tv ever im serious!!! Go to the closest Sony Style store to check it out
I'm not buying the whole concept. Look at the footprint of that thing! My screen on my macbook pro isn't much thicker but it has a big base to it doing all the world. I personally think that "TV" is hideous. So what the screen is 3mm, the base is huge and the whole thing is just ugly. It'd look better if the base was slapped on the back and wall mounted. Screw thin.
Saw this at Electronics Expo in Wayne NJ (www.electronics-expo.com) I thisnk the price was $2800. Is has a great picture (id was being run off a blue ray player) but like all sony tvs it was way too red.
The only reason to buy this is to have the latest and newest and not care about how much money you have.
The company I work for as the 70 inch OLED Sony tv on our inventory screen. It's listed at $35,000 bucks..
Sorry for the double post... disregard this post, the post by RandomNY is the correct post..
The company I work for has the 70 inch OLED TV from SONY, it's being listed at $33,000 bucks we currently have 2 on Display in a couple of stores, none in actual stock yet.
no company has a 70" OLED currently... not even Sony.
The model you are referring to is the 70" Bravia XBR LCD.
Stunning unit and priced around 30k-38k currently.
Worthlesss waste of materials! Nearly as bad as purchasing a hummer.
I am not at all impressed by Sony's "3 mm thick" TV. Seems how you can't remove the base because everything to make it a TV is in the base, it's not truely 3 mm thick.
A couple of points - this model is the first commercially available OLED screen of this size available to market where the expected life of the unit is 20 000 hrs of use . . .other companies are struggling for more than 5000 hrs of use. . . I guess Sony is merely stating "we have just about got this technology licked, nobody else has yet.
Secondly, I have seen this playing of a BluRay (spiderman 3), and the picture looked AMAZING! Almost 3 dimensional. The contrast ratio is 1 million to one on this sucker. . . you have to see it to really appreciate the sense of depth that brings to the picture, not to mention the fact you can view it in full daylight . . . this technology will revolutionise mobile computing.
Thirdly, of course they are working on a larger screen, I have it on good information that Sony are hoping to have a 22inch screen available in the next 12 - 18 months. . . if so, I can't wait to see that !!!