Motorola insider tells all about the fall of a technology icon

In researching the myriad claims raised in this letter -- which we believe to be true -- we also discovered a number of other unsettling things about Motorola's corporate past in the last five years, such as certain gross corporate excesses demanded by Zander and his inner circle (like a small fleet of extravagant private jets, where most companies that size might only have one, if any), or the fact that Motorola's current CEO, Greg Brown, is so technologically out of touch he refuses to use a computer for communications, and has all his email correspondences printed by his secretary and replied to by dictation.
There's no doubt in our minds that Motorola is in dire straits. But today's news of the company's broken-off mobile division only serves to cement the fact that the company no longer knows how to conduct its core consumer business, and is squandering time and money as it flounders in a market that long since passed it by. Motorola did not comment on this story. Letter posted after the break.
-----
Dear Greg Brown, and the rest of the executive team at Motorola,
As you may or may not recall, I worked with Geoffrey Frost as a personal adviser during his days as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the company. I was the one quoted in Forbes in 2003 as saying "Motorola's biggest problem is that Samsung kicks ass," and eventually came to spend nearly three years working with Geoffrey during his efforts to revamp the company's mobile lineup, which eventually saw the launch of the RAZR. As I told the company's senior designers at Motorola's 75th anniversary meeting: create something cooler (and more expensive) than anything else out there, and everyone will want it.
After the success of the RAZR, while Geoffrey was tied up every which way in ROKR development, meetings, criscrossing travel, and so on, through his associates I implored the company to beef up their software expertise, and focus on creating socially networked devices (this was in the years before MySpace and Facebook became the juggernauts they are today). Your predecessor, Ed Zander, had little interest in this, and instead insisted on parlaying his relationship with Steve Jobs into the ill-fated ROKR effort in order to prop up Motorola's stock price.
Zander, who seemed to care more about his golf score than running one of America's greatest technology companies, left all of the hard work to Geoffrey; I've always considered it Motorola's dirty little secret that the strategy for their entire profit machine was run by the company's CMO -- not the rest of the company's executives, who are as inept now as they have ever been.
Many close to Geoffrey believed Ed Zander worked him to death, putting the pressure of the fate of the company in his hands. [That was certainly the buzz around the industry at the time. -Ed.] I took his untimely death in 2005 very hard, and knew that the company would head downhill in the aftermath. On a personal note, Lynne, his wife blamed the company for his passing. She committed suicide soon after.
Meanwhile, Ed Zander continued to reap the dividends of Geoffrey's work as the company made billions in profit from overselling the RAZR for years. Instead of channeling that money into the obvious -- further development of groundbreaking consumer devices -- Zander purchased enterprise companies such as Symbol ($3.9b), and engineered billions of dollars in stock buybacks.
As I told Zander in a phone call in 2007, I felt that he was setting the company up for massive failure. He had the audacity to say, "Well, maybe Geoffrey should have come up with a better successor to the RAZR," and told me to "Wait for big things in 2008." I guess he was right -- the golden parachute he got for his exit from the company was worth about 30 million dollars -- and that doesn't include his accumulated Motorola stock.
Your appointment to the position of chief executive gave me cause for hope, and I reached out to you; I knew you were one of the main drivers behind the enterprise acquisitions, and that you had zero expertise in consumer devices. Surely you could use some help in turning Motorola's flagging cellphone business around?
But apparently different from the rest of the incompetent senior executives at Motorola -- except instead of merely being inept, you're actually actively killing the company. Your lack of understanding of the consumer side of Motorola doesn't give you a valid reason for selling the handset business; moreover, publicly disclosing your explorations of such a move, in an attempt to keep Carl Icahn off your back, shows how much you value the safety of your incompetence.
You clearly have no interest in fighting the good fight and attempting to mold Motorola into the market leader it can and should be. Taking control of the handset division, as you have recently announced, will accomplish very little except but to give you an ability to say, "We tried our best" -- which you haven't -- when you finally do cart the business off to the highest bidder.
In order to turn the handset division around, you need to bring in another Frost; someone worldly and dynamic who is more interested in Motorola's success than their own corporate career. You need to task the company's designers with the same mantra that created the RAZR -- make me a phone that looks, feels, and works like a symbol of wealth and privilege. Recognize the superiority of American software, and bring back those jobs so irresponsibly outsourced to China and Russia. Fully embrace embedded Linux and Google's Android initiative, and take the phone operating system out of the stone age.
Recognize that, while rich people don't really know what they want, the lower end of the market does -- and fund the development of an online "crowdsourced" device design platform to take advantage of this fact. Get rid of all of your silly, useless marketing, including those overpriced and completely ineffective celebrity endorsements, and do one unified global campaign with Daft Punk (the only group whose global appeal extends from American hip hoppers to trendy Shanghai club kids to middle-aged Londoners). Understand that the next big feature in handsets isn't a camera or a music player -- it is social connectedness; build expertise in this area, and sell it down the entire value chain.
I was there when Motorola's handset division was brought back from the brink of death 5 years ago. Follow my advice, and we can do it again.
Maybe it sounds like I take the downfall of Motorola personally; I do. It was my experience at Motorola, with people like Geoffrey and all of the loyal employees who still remain, that taught me what corporate America can and should be. But with people such as Zander and yourself, Motorola symbolizes the worst of our country's corporate culture.
As an immigrant American, and someone who has traveled all over the world, I really do appreciate the uniqueness and importance of the American culture of creativity and ingenuity. Whereas other countries back their money on gold and commodities, we back ours on our ability to invent the future. The failure of Motorola as an American institution of creativity and innovation, should you let it happen, will now be entirely of your doing. Hopefully you'll keep that in mind while the board has the accountants prepare your golden parachute.
Regards,
Numair Faraz
Dated Feb 5, 2008. Letter edited for form.





















Happy Birthday to one of my favorite blogs!
i worked at sun in the late 90s... zander was a scumbag and none of this surprises me.
Moto did the same thing when they brought out the StarTac phone. I was an intern right before they brought that out. They came out with that and rode it into the ground and then got their butts handed to them by Nokia for a bunch of years when they had their 6160.
history repeats with the RAZR.
Beware apple!
This seems to be a Motorola-specific problem. They create cool new devices only every 10 years or so.
Apple is kind of the opposite, they will take their best-selling product of today and end of life it and replace it with a new product. Like they did with the mini when the nano came out. I am still not sure that was such a great idea, but they certainly have balls.
I disagree with both your comment and the gist of this letter (although I fully support the tone and “feeling” behind both).
Saying the Motorola missed the boat on generation-based usage demographic change is basically saying that Motorola failed to do good marketing strategy, or failed to listen to the marketing strategists. It’s a management and culture problem at Motorola. Their design mistakes seem to have come as a result of these management and culture problems.
The author noted “I've always considered it Motorola's dirty little secret that the strategy for their entire profit machine was run by the company's CMO -- not the rest of the company's executives, who are as inept now as they have ever been.”. That’s as it should be actually…the man who knows what the market wants should be in charge. Ideally though, that man would get a lot of back-up and cooperation from the other executives.
I’m not convinced that Motorola selling its phone division is a bad thing…maybe it can do better as part of another company (I bet it will be a Chinese company that ends up buying it BTW). I strongly disagree with the authors assertions that outsourcing software development was wrong. Rather, it seems the Motorola didn’t do enough software development at all…even outsourced software efforts would have been better than what they got. And the authors suggestions as to what direction product development should go in seems way too simplistic. Same goes for those calling for Moto to make “the next iPhone”. Moto competes in international markets, with very different market structures, barriers to entry, different power levels of channel partners (ie. the Telecoms), etc. They needed to match the competition in camera quality and did not. They need a music-phone offering in different styles and form-factors. The authors assertion to focus just on this high-end market is just wrong.
I will say this though… Motorola seems to lack the courage that other companies have. Yes, Nokia has not embraced the US Telecoms like others have. Yet Nokia produces very innovative products which sell world-wide. Samsung – a company which does not have particularly great marketing – has managed to position itself as a upper end 1st tier company world-wide by focusing on build quality, good industrial design, while matching the feature-sets of Nokia and SE. (and Samsung focuses on non-US markets more than US market, where it leads!) Meanwhile, Motorola has several great models on the market which use embedded Linux, but they failed to support it sufficiently because they didn’t want to upset the US Telecoms. They didn’t even bother to pursue EASY wins, like writing a Linux BT Keyboard driver for the Ming/A1000/Z6/E6 phones, or, for that matter, a word document reader/editor (which mid-range Samsung non-smartphones have). They needlessly left out most Java certificates on their phones compared to Nokia phones. They have failed to consistently adopt Symbian. Heck, if they leased S60 from Nokia and put it on a Razar like phone, they would have more success than with their current Smart-phone line-up. They are very late in putting high-end features in phones (is there any autofocus Moto on the market yet? This is becoming a standard mid-range feature soon). I’m not saying Motorola needs to follow or master one OS plateform…with outsourcing and good resource management, they could have released Symbian and WM plateform smartphones while slowly building support around its own “open” format. But to do so means that they have to move with confidence. And somehow confidence is what Motorola lacks.
Well written. Although...the almighty dollar is backed by the largest gold reserves in the world. Ever.
The "almighty dollar" hasn't been backed by gold or any other physical asset since 1975. It's value mostly lies in the future wealth of American taxpayers.
I meant "Its value..." Sorry.
RAZR?
Wasn't that made by Foxconn, hawked around the entire mobile phone industry, turned down by several major players (quality issues) until Moto seized upon it...?
If I'm right, then that explains why every other (inhouse) product has flopped (RIZR, ROKR, PEBL, SLVR).
If I'm wrong, then how come none of the other products ever did as well?
you're an idiot. do you ever read?
think outside of u.s.a and this is the picture;
motorola was never a groundbreaking handset company.. they were best at early innovations (that radios someone talked about) and silicon devices.. after their chip division broke off and became freescale, motorola ended imo.. it started to collect the money generating from the years of productivity from the past and eventually that well has run dry..
nokia muscled ericsson out of europe, so they merged with sony to have a say in asia.. with europe and asia so tightly under control, motorola only had some influence stateside.. that is on handsets.. freescale on the other hand, is constantly closing up with the top players..
Beyond being too personal and nasty to take seriously, this blowhard actually thinks that this letter is the time to suggest that DAFT PUNK is the salvation of Motorola's future marketing?
I guess this letter was intended to be a joke.
IMO, Motorola is well overdue for a new logo / rebranding.
"Max Savin @ Mar 26th 2008 1:13PM said ...
We need Steve Jobs to take over."
Actually Motorola need the likes of Numair Faraz to take over.
Do you think this letter will rule Faraz out of the running for the new Mobile Devices CEO or CMO positions??? Sounds like the type of visionary Moto needs to lead right now...
What a terrific roadmap to the typical demise of once market-leading technology companies. Think of Palm, HP's printer business, Nortel's small business phone system business… the list is endless. These CEOs make a fortune on the backs of smart, creative and hardworking types like Faraz and Frost, then believe that the gravy train will never end and go out and polish their golf scores, do useless and hopeless aquisitions and leave with giant and undeserved payouts. Steve Jobs seems to be the only one who won't take any one home run as enough, and keeps on innovating.
My husband is one of those loyal employees. He's lasted through 11 bloody layoffs and I am so glad to finally see someone speak truth about the litany of STUPID mistakes Motorola seems to make over and freaking over again!!!!
Motorola'sfailure started at the top. The board should be taken out and shot for the deal they cut with Zander. It seems like every quarter he would lay people off to fix the bottom line and get a bigger bonus, how did the board not catch on and stop this? They good things that happened while he was there were things already in motion before he got there. Chris Galvin was not a great leader, but he did seem to have the company's best interests at heart. I saw Ed Zander speak in early 2007, he walked in to a room filled over capacity with people seriously worried about their jobs. Did he try to explain his strategy? No, he joked around for about an hour and left. Motorola needs to quit taking two years to develop a phone. They need to figure out that nobody cares if the phone is indestructible, they'll just get another. What people want is a phone that works properly out of the box, not a couple of months down the road when the fix is available. I use a Moto Ming, this phone rocks! But it was never sold here because it would have gutted RAZR and Q sales and it doesn't run Windows Mobile. The marketing people should be taken out and shot too. What the heck was up with the slasher ads for RAZR2? The print stuff looked like somebody watched Mortal Kombat too many times. What motorola needs is a Tiger Team for Mobile Devices, a small group to come up with a solid phone and get it to market in 6 months. Just my $.02
It's a another example on the failure of outsourcing. Moto did that for a long time as the software was developed in China. I remembered the V70, many friends want it but throw it away very soon because of shitty software.
I don't have much idea on 'good' outsourcing management, especially to somewhere that far far away, unless you are able to pull the trigger towards incompetent across the pacific ocean.
in all fairness, moto is not alone in that. none of the handset makers know how to make software. and it's hurting them right now. these are billion dollar corporations but could they create a 1:1 iPhone clone even if they wanted to? No. They can't.
misunderstanding the power of software seems to be a common trait in management. they don't get it until it's too late.
test
test
Anybody who experienced the groundbreaking innovation of the MPX300 and the subsequent loss of the potential to turn the handset market on its ear...well they knew the terrible misteps portended the end.
Basically, CorporateLand only cares about the destination, not the journey.
Shhh... do you hear that?
...It's Motorola's stock value collapsing.
This really is a shame. But not surprising. I don't think Motorola ever put out a decent product besides the RAZR. And even then, the only thing the RAZR had going for it was the slick hardware design - and not to knock what Frost did - but it soon became a novelty that quickly wore off because the OS was at best, tolerable, and at worst, awful. This of course, is understandable considering that every product has a limited life cycle. And as so many of us know, the RAZR was the last time Motorola ever innovated to any degree.
Re-heating leftovers for the millionth time and thinking and acting as though it's great just because you added an extra spoonful and put it on a plate of a different color, doesn't count for anything. A bit more memory, a bit more res on the camera, and a casing in a different color, and then expecting people to "ooo" and "aaahhh" like mindless cattle, is absurd.
On another note, I'm not sure I agree that Daft Punk is the answer to Motorola's marketing woes - that's another topic for another time - but that aside, Numair hit the nail on the head; however, he forgot to mention one thing in his letter:
--- Motorola DESPERATELY needs to get rid of that pathetic naming convention they've held onto like grim death. RAZR? ROKR? SLVR? How boring! Time to move on! For this reason and others, Motorola reminds me of a rock 'n' roll star who never writes any new music but just keeps milking the same old songs he wrote 20 years ago: "Eeeeeev'ry roooooose has its thorn...!" Come up with something new... PLEASE! Preferably something with names that have ALL the consonants and vowels we'd expect them to have and in their proper places - names we can easily figure out and pronounce! Translation: "That horse is dead! Lay your stick down and walk away."
To the person or people damaging/killing Motorola: Whatever you do, whatever you end up with - golden parachute or not - remember, this isn't as much about technology as it is about all the people in and around your company. And remember, this life is not about what you get, and certainly not about what you take. It's about how you serve God and mankind, about relationships, and what you leave behind. It's about growing and being an excellent steward of the responsibilities, the people and relationships, the resources, and all the things placed in your care. Fulfilling that is built by doing the right thing each and every day which demands action based on acknowledging and understanding true wisdom which reveals that this life isn't about YOU. It's about serving God and others. Don't believe me? Go back and read the letter Numair wrote and read between the lines.
Who ever said Moto doesn't not have a 3G line-up was wrong. Let's not forget that V3x was voted "Best 3GSM Handset - 2006" in Barcelona at the 3GSM World Congress.
Not to mention the new dual display V9 that no one seems to be talking here. Nokia does not even come close to the quality that V9 & Z9 bring to the table. As far as the IPhone, without a hot-spot for WiFi you're stuck in the EDGE era. Will take a while before Apple can master the 3G arena !!
"the man widely regarded as the father of the RAZR" - we need a paternity test! How many fathers does RAZR have? But seriously, a CMO probably had the least to do with a cutting edge device (at the time! no flames!)...enough sycophancy already.
Perhaps Frost's only contribution to RAZR was the 4 letter name.
Shame-shame to all the CEO's. I am one of the many that let go in 2007 cause the JOBS went across the South boarder to Mexico and China.
I was a 25 year Motorolan and would of STUCK with the company NO MATTER WHAT....but again you failed and still are.
To ALL the "comrads" still there hang on tight..Motorola is still a world renoun NAME and these CLOWNS sitting in the big "tour" are leaches...and FORGET that this is America and we can do whatever needs to be done/built with pride.We DO NOT need cheap labor...that is how you get *&*&^%$# products.
I wish we could bring back BOB CALVIN he was the GOOD for this company.
I am still jobless (and MANY other of my "comrads/co-workers)thanks to you Zander and your great ideas....hope you are enjoying your millions, while US the little people that made you richer still are struggling.
I AM A VERY PROUD AMERICAN but not so of some of those CEO not only at Motorola but other big corporations where their thought are on ONLY how much "mula" they can make.
Old saying....what goes around comes around....; learn how to live a little less extravagant and be part of the "little people".
Greg Brown doesn't have an MBA
"...over the years Numair has become increasingly disenfranchised with the company's direction..."
"Disenfranchised"? As an immigrant, perhaps he's unable to vote because he's not yet become an naturalized citizen, but I doubt Motorola had anything to do with that -- unless it's an H-1B visa issue...
Oh, did you mean "disenchanted"?
One fact, Motorola needs to focus beyond its own backyard... America is one market and culture... Samsung, LG and Nokia focus on the global mobile market. Second point - the mass market knows what it wants and developing that want needs to happen in time and within means of development costs. Samsung, Nokia, LG hell even HTC launch 60 to 90 handsets a year around the globe. Motorola launch 10 to 15 all over cost developments, all on the same old OS and platform, stop looking for the American icon product and start meeting the global market needs, segmented handsets meeting for all market demos from VSE to Consumer segments a to e. Will cost the earth to catch-up not sure they have the pocket to do this, but chasing the Icon will cost much much more. But then what do I really know as the Head of Devices for a Telco.
Ehh, I'd say it's the other way around. The vast majority of non-US cell phone manufacturers give the US the short end of the stick (proof: look at all the awesome phones that either are never released with US bands or only are released with them months later).
Great article.
I am relieved to hear that there were such passionate and selfless Motorolans in the past such as Geoffrey Frost and Numair Faraz. As a current Motorola employee, I really wish we have more such people in the senior management. If our new CEO were like either one of them, I would definitely put in 200% to help turn around the once great company it was.
I think the downfall of Motorola shows quite a bit about big corporations.
It was headed for the shitter, and the RAZR brought it back.
If only it had a CEO that cared about someone other than himself, it could create something to bring itself back again.
GoodbyeMoto.
I think the entire short-term-grab-what-you-can-and-get-out mentality at Motorola goes back further than the most recent CEO's. I believe it goes back to the 90's and George Fisher. He came in and -- to inflate stock prices-- cut the shit out of R&D, killed off a bunch of interesting and intelligent projects, took his stock options and ran off to Kodak (to kill them).
Chris Galvin would have been a decent follow up to his father. He just didn't have the know-how to turn around the damage caused by Fisher. Since then the entire company is in a death spiral. They've fired their best engineers and best thinkers in a 'making the best of a bad situation' mentality. Make what money you can and get out.
Many US companies have done this... and suffered. Mot is not the only one, but-- because it was a good place to work and the workforce there believed in what they were doing under Paul Galvin-- it's one of the most tragic.
This is an incredibly eye-opening letter. I'm actually kind of shocked.
I mean, we all knew Moto had hit hard times, but I personally had no idea it was this bad.
How far does an employee get pushed before they write something like this? How long does someone watch a company they obviously care about get flushed down the toilet to line the pockets of their share-holders?
America's sick, people: this kind of shit is happening in all the large corporations in the country... the executive is beholden to the market, and NOT the consumer.
Moto's had some great successes. I've owned 3 RAZRs... bought my first right when they came out, and loved them. Sure, the software wasn't great, but as a phone it did its job. I never had any complaints... the hardware was top-notch. I dropped it from the 59/Lex platform onto the subway tracks below, and besides a little gouge in the plastic at the bottom of the handset, it laughed and said, "Is that all you got, you pansy?"
Motorola makes some fantastic products, but drops the ball in so many ways. Case in point: amateur radio.
Motorola makes some incredible commercial two-way radio products. But they don't focus on markets that have the potential to expand their business and increase brand recognition. All of Moto's two-way radio products are capable of working in the amateur radio spectrum, but they only care about selling to those huge government agencies who love to play fast and loose with taxpayer money. ><
(Keep in mind there are still about 700K hams in America today, and millions worldwide... it would take very little engineering effort to write new firmware for their two-way products to work for hams.)
As a ham, it's taken some clever hacking of surplus radios in order to use them in the amateur spectrum; but when they work, they are literally solid as rocks. A friend of mine dropped one of his off a 4 story building (no joke), and besides a broken antenna (a $10 replacement part), it kept on working.
Motorola's doomed, unfortunately. Their failures extend way beyond lack of vision in the handset portion of the company. It's an entire corporate raison d'etre that's busted.
And the sad fact is that Motorola won't be the last huge American company to flush itself down the shitter. Upstart companies from the Far East and India will supplant them; they're more efficient, adaptable and versatile.
It's truly a tragedy.
Motorola does not listen to its market. Motorola does not listen to their sales force – those at point of sale. Motorola DOES listen to over-priced Advertising Agencies who know how to promote their own image. Motorola does not know how to separate their various development, marketing and sales needs into channels of expertise. Instead, engineers are asked to write advertising copy, the sales force is ignored and everybody else spends their time making sure the yearly change in corporate advertising guidelines is followed to a T. As long as the color palette is spot on the advertising will be great – no? Gee, go ask the big-ass media agency that doesn't know how many divisions, products, services, existing markets, and emerging markets there are at Motorola. Maybe that's why they hired all those has been rock stars to promote a cell phone.
If you are not Motorolan, you do not understand how big and how much problem inside.
What Numair Faraz mention is a part of problem. Technial issue is around every company but it could be controlled. However, it's one of big problem inside. I believe Numair Faraz is from marketing view.
The manager level do not give right roadmap. The PM team cannot give right sepc. The develop team cannot do well in their job. The market team cannot feedback what market need in right time. Those cause Motorola fail in deign their future in mobile phone business.
Outsourcing is not guilty. If you can make a good plan in your roadmap, you can use outsourcing to make biggest profit in this way. Motorola ever success in some of C model but fail after that. Motorola seems do not know what they need in recent year.
Do you know how much platform in Motorola? Do you know how much problem in each platform? LJ platform is amazing idea if it can success replace P2K platform.
Motorola is not like Nokia, SE, Samsung. Single-platform or multiple-platform both fail in Motorola. Is that pure technical problem like Numair Faraz say? I do not agree. It's more complex than that.
Motorola MD business indeed need a good CEO to turn over their each functionality. To make a good change. I am looking forward Motorola can back to mobile phone business in 2010. But please remember what they learn in RAZR - Do not stop, move! Mobile phone is a consumer business now. You need change very fast to fight with other company. You need specific a good roadmap to fit next 3 to 5 years market.
And who brought these jerks on board as CEOs ? The board. Icahn should have all the seats in the board, shareholders.
IMHO, I do not think Icahn want to save mobile phone business. He only want is save his stock, save his money.
Spin-off MD business unit save Motorola? Yes, because to back no. 1 of mobile phone business indeed need lots of money and a long time. Motorola may move their profit from connection home and other business unit to help mobile device business. Motorola can save more money after spin-off.
But to spin off mobile business is not a good solution to save mobile device business!
The problem still there, without good CEO, problem will not resolve by itself. And without other business unit, mobile device business unit have enough money to hold until 2010? I doubt it.
What's a stupid suggestion to save mobile devices business unit Icahn provide?
It just give a good chance to save shareholder's money, but leave mobile device business unit to die or to live by himself.
Moreover, to spin off mobile device business unit only speed up more good employee to quit. When we need a good CEO to lead these people to back right direction, Motorola to spin off this BU and push more employee to quit. It give next CEO more hard to pull bak.
What's opportunity Icahn, Greg and other board give? Yes, they give other company a good chance to acquire this old and great business unit.
Mr. Greg Killer Brown.
Last year, Mr. Greg Killer Brown (as COO) had kill the oldest Motorola group Automotive. This year he kills MOTO. Reading this letter and his background on Bussiness Week I don't see any hope for Motorola.
One thing for sure that is he is as smart as Zander meaning get into Motorola and scratch as much money then run. He has no, nada, nothing, to show as a leader even his statement sound more like a politician than a true corporate leader. Many times he says Motorola has many great talent then each time he cut them.
Mr. great leader, Greg Killer Brown has no guts to be CEO of the falling comrade (mobile device) but screw it over and challenge someone to rescue it while he is going to sit on the bussiness that is still making money. In which, he can collect more and more Motorola cash before running away.
I agreed with the comments here saying that corporate America should screw all the MBA that is not growing up in technical. Look at Freescale. After Motorola spin it out, the leader there growing up inside Motorola and took them up so good before privatize. Mr. Greg Killer Brown is no Motorolan he came to get his money and run as Ed Zander. That is corporate America problem now a day. Who cares for corporate long term growth? Money in the pocket is the one and only goal for their personal. That is why (they, in general) and Mr. Greg Killer Brown (as specific) are like a politician. They do whatever it take to grow up corporate ladder without any true talent. When the raining day has come the dig away. That is Mr. Great Killer Brown.
It's a sorrow chapter for a great American Icon technical company was build by Gavin some 70s year is killed by a no talent, politician alike guy named Great Killer Brown.
It is a sad story.
Perhaps, if told earlier, maybe your fellow employees might have done something to force their hand.
The problem with the Motorola handset business is simply that the folks running that business still have that STARTAC mentality. Make a single phone and ride it for years. The problem is that the market has changed and to keep up, you have to change and change continuously. Zander was just out for a fast buck and Brown... the jury is still out, but he does appear to be protecting his rear with the Icann story. This is the last great American handset maker. It appears we're going the way of Zenith.
I worked at Moto and was deeply involved in the product side of mobile devices.
Re the ROKR, Jobs insisted on the limitations that made it a failure.
Regarding marketing: Mr Frost was a visionary. Coming from Nike he knew how to make a product a "lifestyle" and how to sell image over technical features. If Moto had introduced the RAZR as the C145 it would have flopped. After the death of Mr Frost Ed Zander hired the ex Hinz marketing guy (the "ketchup guy" as we called him). You couldn't get further from marketing lifestyle than hiring a guy whose accomplishments were the "no drip cap" and the new "fridge door bottle". Instead of moving branding forward it was more of the same and the Koreans (LG & Samsung) learned how to hire Industrial Design wizards and hip marketing folks too. Recently the ketchup guy was let go (let's hope French's Mustard hires him).
Moto does some things VERY well, Industrial design and materials, RF (radio stuff), and maufacturing/supply chain.
What they can't do are two key things: Portfolio Planning and manage Software Development.
In portfolio planning the various global regions (US, Europs, Asia) would give their feedback on proposed models and had the power to kill proposals by vote. The problem was that cutting edge innovative products could take 18-24 months to bring to market and the regions would only repeat what their customers were asking for today. So Moto was always late and never ahead. The telling fact is that the RAZR was NOT done by the normal planning and engineering process and instead was funded as a private experiment by some visionary VPs. The regions and portfolio folks wanted to kill it. When RAZR hit no one thought about fixing the system that couldn't produce it.
In SW I can say that I have never seen poorer methodology, engineering process, technology decisions or talent. I met the WiFi architect who never had used a hotspot. I saw a SW build system where every engineer (there were thousands) would branch the whole tree just to fix one file and then rebuild the entire system after touching just the one file. Moto had more engineers on handset SW than Microsoft has on Office and Windows combined (I worked at both companies). The head of the 7500+ SW division for most of the post RAZR debacle was a PhD in Chemistry who had come to Moto from a business strategy consulting company and yes, he had never written SW or managed a team that had. This is the "LJ" Linux SW platform described in the main article and trust me it was an architectural and execution disaster.
Finally Moto was a little too "global". It had engineering teams everywhere. I was on conf calls with engineers from Florida, Illinois, California, India and China trying to work on the same feature, total chaos. They also tended to locate most of their engineers in abandoned factories in such high tech deserts as Plantation Florida and Libertyville Illinois. Attracting talent to those places was near impossible and the talent you did have tended to be there because they couldn't leave the area (family commitments...). Moto had hardly any engineers in the Valley or Seattle.
So in my opinon the author of this article is right in that the death of Mr Frost and his replacement by "the ketchup guy" was bad. I disagree that Moto's LJ platform had any chance of success. I insist that Moto's poor planning and inability to transform from a HW company into a SW company, where most of the magic in cell phones now occurs, are the underlying reasons for their demise.
Just my $0.02...
I think when you say "disenfranchised", you really mean "disenchanted".
Seems that there is an error in the letter: it tells that the software works should be taken back from China and Russia. I think it shall say "China and India" because Russia does the software much better that China and India do (and US, for that matter). In other word, outsourcing the software works to Russia is the best thing Motorola had done.
I just read this again, and I cried :(