Too bad good looks and a bunch of features can't make up for mediocre-to-crappy image quality, which Samsung's cameras have consistently showed throughout the years.
1. When I was shopping point & shoot digital cameras this time last year, I was torn between a great price on a Samsung and the brand new model in Casio's Exilim line. I tried out the Samsung in the store and couldn't believe the poor quality shots I was getting (unfocused shots in a brightly lit Target). I wound up going with the Casio.
Ya, people see "10.2 Megapixels" and they assume they're going to get great "quality"... most people fail to realize that Megapixels are just as important as Lens quality/brightness and image processing... neither of which Samsung is known for.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
giuliop @ Mar 27th 2008 7:56PM
Too bad good looks and a bunch of features can't make up for mediocre-to-crappy image quality, which Samsung's cameras have consistently showed throughout the years.
Kate @ Mar 27th 2008 10:46PM
1. When I was shopping point & shoot digital cameras this time last year, I was torn between a great price on a Samsung and the brand new model in Casio's Exilim line. I tried out the Samsung in the store and couldn't believe the poor quality shots I was getting (unfocused shots in a brightly lit Target). I wound up going with the Casio.
2. Manny!!!
Chad @ Mar 28th 2008 12:06AM
Ya, people see "10.2 Megapixels" and they assume they're going to get great "quality"... most people fail to realize that Megapixels are just as important as Lens quality/brightness and image processing... neither of which Samsung is known for.