Skip to Content
core3 anyone? maybe core3quad,core3hexa,core3octo
Octocore might sound better
Core2 with an HT part on the stikcer.Core2HTcuz its just hyperthreaded.But when they make the 16 thread, 8 core one.... :D:D:D:D:DCore2 OctoHTor justIntel PlaysCrisisDoomandBlendswhilewelcomingnewoverlordsandlikingmudkipswihrickrollblocking+
it says the quad cores are (currently) clocked at 3.2 GHz, but that screenshot looks like 8 cores to me.. no wait, its probably just hyperthreading.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
martin @ Apr 2nd 2008 1:06PM
core3 anyone? maybe core3quad,core3hexa,core3octo
Kevin Borquist @ Apr 2nd 2008 4:03PM
Octocore might sound better
Macha88 @ Apr 2nd 2008 5:05PM
Core2 with an HT part on the stikcer.
Core2HT
cuz its just hyperthreaded.
But when they make the 16 thread, 8 core one....
:D:D:D:D:D
Core2 OctoHT
or just
Intel PlaysCrisisDoomandBlendswhilewelcomingnewoverlordsandlikingmudkipswihrickrollblocking+
maveric101 @ Apr 2nd 2008 9:20PM
it says the quad cores are (currently) clocked at 3.2 GHz, but that screenshot looks like 8 cores to me.. no wait, its probably just hyperthreading.