Skip to Content
Am I the only one thinking putting a rush job on the next version of Windows to appease shareholders is a bad idea? If past experience is anything to go by, rushing it out when it's not ready would be foolish.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
It's not. I'm pretty sure that they've been working on this as long, or even longer than they'be been working on Vista.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
JackDebian @ Apr 4th 2008 3:49PM
Am I the only one thinking putting a rush job on the next version of Windows to appease shareholders is a bad idea? If past experience is anything to go by, rushing it out when it's not ready would be foolish.
Kieran @ Apr 4th 2008 8:28PM
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Jesse S @ Apr 5th 2008 3:39PM
It's not. I'm pretty sure that they've been working on this as long, or even longer than they'be been working on Vista.