Weekend circulars show jailbroken iPod touch with Installer on board

Update: Take a look at a screen grab from the circular after the break.
[Thanks, Matt & Oscar M]



A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Lol
(This is a bit better than yelling "FIRST!")
-back on topic-
Maybe the picture is there intentionally as deceptive ads. Besides, after Circuit City botched a car in an attempt to install a GPS, of course they use the ever-so-reliable Google Images rather than to take pics of their products. Darn corner cutting jerks!
hilarious!
I was so tempted to say first, jk. Hey maybe we can sue them for false advertising when we go to the store and find out that the ipods are not really jailbroken.
I'm not sure who nodded off in the art department at Engadget but scanning a circular makes a much cleaner image than taking a picture. ;-)
Shows you how much Apple are idiots and don't make the phone unlocked in the first place, even their ads are jail broken.
You know it isn't a phone, right?
@James:
Dude, read the post. Reasons you're an fanboidiot:
1.) It's an iPod Touch, not an iPhone.
2.) This has absolutely nothing to do with the iPhone being unlocked or not, regardless of the fact it should be, but blah blah blah
3.) You clearly have no idea what it means to jailbreak, much less the difference between that and being locked to a cellular carrier.
Read, then think, THEN speak... not the reverse.
The ad says 'Authorised Ipod Reseller' for how much longer?
same thing in my chicago circuit city ads. Seems like they can't wait till June
I'm pretty sure when you scan something in you can't really call it a "screengrab"
as of 10:37 am CST, i't still on their site to...frakin hilarious.
http://radioshack.shoplocal.com/radioshack/Default.aspx?action=browsepageflash&storeid=2407383&rapid=529396&pagenumber=1&prvid=RadioShack-080413&promotioncode=RadioShack-080413
HAHAHAHA
Indeed.
Why people would even bother with a product from a company as controlling as the SS I may never know.
I hope this means they're Pre-Jailbroken!!
I am pretty sure this is firmware v2, not a jail broken iphone
Installer is there. It's jailbroken.
I am pretty sure your an idiot
Yep, it's firmware 2.0 with an Installer.app on there. Yup, and Steve Jobs has hair. So true indeed.
Ray @ Apr 13th 2008 4:19PM:
I am pretty sure your an idiot
Not that I don't agree with your (note correct usage) sentiment but come on. When accusing someone of being an idiot, don't be one yourself. You're. YOU'RE. You are. You're = you are. Get it? Seems to be contagious as others can't get a handle on it in more recent comments too.
uh oh! Grammar police!
i got pwned
As it's a pro-noun I think 'police' should be 'Police'. ;)
Don't shorten proper noun to pro-noun. A pronoun is completely and utterly different than a proper noun.
"completely and utterly" are synonyms; therefore, your comment contains a redundancy. I will deduct one point from your ranking.
You should've capitalized the first letter of your sentence.
Jesus Christ, I'm pretty sure that this is the most intellectual reply string ever posted on Engadget.
I'm only replying to this because I feel that if I'm part of this thread that my grammar and overall IQ has increased.
...and of course by "has increased" I mean "will increase"...
Though technically correct, Chase, I would avoid using the contraction "should've," especially when speaking. It gives off the impression that you are saying "should of", which is quite obviously incorrect. When used in writing, it gives off the impression of being slang, even though it is acceptable grammar.
I'm glad that other people get so intense with proper grammar usage. And apostrophe placement :)
The chain of grammar comments amuses me.
@ DreadConches @ Apr 13th 2008 7:38PM
Don't shorten proper noun to pro-noun. A pronoun is completely and utterly different than a proper noun.
If you wish to be pedantic, then your whole sentence modality is flawed, it should read 'One should not shorten proper noun to pro-noun'.
"it should read 'One should not shorten proper noun to pro-noun'."
I proffer that --- for the sake of clarity --- your attempt at correcting his grammar is not clear enough for educational purposes. Since it is proper grammar that we are seeking, the implicit recognition that clarity is derived from proper grammar is simply not a facet we can spare to overlook.
Therefore, may I humbly suggest the following revision?
'One should not shorten the [term] ["]proper noun["] to pro-noun'.
Or perhaps the following would invoke the clarity necessary for this discussion: 'One should not shorten the [term] ["]proper noun["] to the [term] ["]pro-noun["]'.
@Chase M:
I do realize that you are correct ...if it had been my quote. As it was not not my quote, I merely left the capitalization and grammar intact so as not to offend the original author. A form of literary device.
I probably should have prefaced the quote with, "The phrase 'completely and utterly' ..."
However, I will admit that I was being grammatically lazy, as were you with "should've". Therefore, I am marking both of our comments with a negative one.
Shutup, shutup, shutup!!!
Shutup: Your search did not return any results.
Source: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&s=shutup&h=0000&j=2#c
Shut up: (v) hush, quieten, silence, still, shut up, hush up (cause to be quiet or not talk) "Please silence the children in the church!"
Source: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&s=shut%20up&h=0000&j=2#c
"Grammar police, arrest this girl
Her choice of words is
making me feel ill
and we have crashed her party
This is what you get
This is what you get
This is what you get when you mess with us"
""completely and utterly" are synonyms; therefore, your comment contains a redundancy."
I vote to stamp out and eradicate superfluous redundancy.
What's with all the fuzz here? Maybe his first language isn't english (i.e. mine is french)... Altought I do believe it would be a lot better if we would make an effort when we post something, just saying...
@Oskin: This thread is the logical outcome of Ray posting, "I am pretty sure your [sic] an idiot".
One must exercise due diligence in his choice of words and grammar if one intends to use the word "idiot" to describe another poster.
As an aside: his proper usage of "an" instead of "a", along with the proper sentence structure, would suggest he is capable of using the correct grammar for "you're".
Besides, nearly everyone here has an elevated sense of self-worth; hence, they want to prove their intellectual prowess by berating others for their grammar. This thread has given such ones the ability to do this in a safe, controlled enviroment.
Plus, its' fricking fun !!!
I found this mine radioshack paper to.
LOL :)
That's not the important part.
The important part is, WHERE IS THE ZUNE AD?
Where indeed. :)
I'm replying to a post from a couple months ago but ...
Mark, I believe when you say, "I found this mine radioshack paper to,"
you mean to say, I found this mine radioshack paper to[o].
None of the Circuit City circulars in California have the jailbroken touch picture, just the regular one. Hmmm...
Too funny. Just checked the RadioShack website and sure enough the picture is there on the weekly ad.
Whats with the flower? Is that like some kind of sunflower growing game or something?
Thats the 'Photos' button, if I'm not mistaken*.
*I'm not.
LOL at:
"Is that like some kind of sunflower growing game or something?"
I would like to have that if I buy that one! So I can carry my sprouts and agriculture everywhere I go!
(I used to have a Sunflower once but the dog ate it.) :'(
and to quote the Art Department guy "iPhucked"
best comment since the layout change