@ danny "Take, for example, Darwinian evolution. It was once a plausible theory, but now most esteemed scientists vehemently oppose it's possibility"
I'm not sure I follow you. Most esteemed scientists don't question the validity of evolution as a theory. Pretty much all of the arguments are about the finer details rather than about evolution by natural selection.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
PaulB @ Apr 28th 2008 1:39PM
@ danny
"Take, for example, Darwinian evolution. It was once a plausible theory, but now most esteemed scientists vehemently oppose it's possibility"
I'm not sure I follow you. Most esteemed scientists don't question the validity of evolution as a theory. Pretty much all of the arguments are about the finer details rather than about evolution by natural selection.