So stupid! This is a step backwards as far as I'm concerned, and converting more farmland away from food production, and more towards energy production is not going to help food costs. And how the heck would you charge the stupid thing? You'd have to buy fuel for it, which seems far less convenient than simply plugging it into a wall. I think that hydrogen fuel cells are much more advantageous in this respect: They don't use biofuels, they can simply be plugged in to be recharged, and they're clean energy assuming that the power supplied through your wall outlet is clean energy. No nasty byproducts either like battery acid.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Adrian @ May 4th 2008 7:31PM
So stupid! This is a step backwards as far as I'm concerned, and converting more farmland away from food production, and more towards energy production is not going to help food costs. And how the heck would you charge the stupid thing? You'd have to buy fuel for it, which seems far less convenient than simply plugging it into a wall. I think that hydrogen fuel cells are much more advantageous in this respect: They don't use biofuels, they can simply be plugged in to be recharged, and they're clean energy assuming that the power supplied through your wall outlet is clean energy. No nasty byproducts either like battery acid.
Correct me if I'm wrong, please!