I don't see anything wrong with releasing gigahertz CPU's with Windows XP so long as they have decent HDD and decent RAM.
I have foreign students who can't afford laptops i'd recommend such as the HP DV series so its good to be getting options, even if they are the so called "race to the bottom"
I remember an article on Tom's Hardware (IIRC) that had them installing Windows XP on every system they possibly could. It actually installed onto a 386 with only 1MB of RAM... it wouldn't run for beans, but Windows XP is just such a flexible OS when it comes to hardware.
It appears to be a full 1600Mhz Atom. Google doesn't translate this page well for some reason. The performance glitch is not a hardware problem, but an issue with Intel Speedstep. Like any other Intel laptop, the best approach is probably to disable Speedstep and use third-party software to manage your cpu speed.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I don't see anything wrong with releasing gigahertz CPU's with Windows XP so long as they have decent HDD and decent RAM.
I have foreign students who can't afford laptops i'd recommend such as the HP DV series so its good to be getting options, even if they are the so called "race to the bottom"
I remember an article on Tom's Hardware (IIRC) that had them installing Windows XP on every system they possibly could. It actually installed onto a 386 with only 1MB of RAM... it wouldn't run for beans, but Windows XP is just such a flexible OS when it comes to hardware.
It appears to be a full 1600Mhz Atom. Google doesn't translate this page well for some reason. The performance glitch is not a hardware problem, but an issue with Intel Speedstep. Like any other Intel laptop, the best approach is probably to disable Speedstep and use third-party software to manage your cpu speed.