i know everyone has heard it before... but why make low-end HDTVs? i mean, if you want to display HD content, why not do it on a TV that is atleast going to do it justice?
This tv still has the specs to provide stunning HD at 1080p. One of the biggest reasons other tvs are considered "high-end" and expensive is because they have a thinner frame, or have other ad-ons such-as high-end speakers, but visually 95% of viewers can barely tell any difference.
The X-Fi3 keeps with the company's commitment to audio fidelity, thanks to the apt-X codec, which supposedly offers audio quality similar to a wired connection when streaming. On that front, the device also handles FLAC files.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
i know everyone has heard it before... but why make low-end HDTVs? i mean, if you want to display HD content, why not do it on a TV that is atleast going to do it justice?
not everyone can afford/care about those specific details in HD, they just want something thinner than there 1970's box tv.... :)
This tv still has the specs to provide stunning HD at 1080p. One of the biggest reasons other tvs are considered "high-end" and expensive is because they have a thinner frame, or have other ad-ons such-as high-end speakers, but visually 95% of viewers can barely tell any difference.