It looks the same, only the image on the right was accidentally horizontally reflected or something. The left one is just uber scaled and interpolated.
Actually if you analyze the picture little more, you can see that the iPhone on the left (3G supposedly) has a non-shiny edge, defused look, like if it was made of "plastic".
I shrinked down the current iPhone to make it look as pixelated as the icon and it still had the shiny edge.
This might actually mean that it is in fact the rumored iPhone 3G new look.
Ah, but you took a full-size image and scaled it down. The illustrator program that created that vector image to begin with would have interpolated some details out of a low-res exported image for the sake of clarity, also a lot of those vectors would have been resized down to zero if it was resized as a vector.
While a matte bezel would be nice from a lack-of-scratches point of view, this is not proof positive. Nothing to see here . . . move along.
You guys are reading way, way, way too much into this. It is the standard iPhone. The only REAL difference is you can actually see the volume and vibrate switches on the icon, and you can't see the sleep/wake, while on the real phone pictured you can't see volume/vibe but can see sleep/wake.
That is to say, the picture of the "real" iPhone looks as different from the current iPhone as the icon does. They're identical, get over it.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It looks the same, only the image on the right was accidentally horizontally reflected or something. The left one is just uber scaled and interpolated.
Nope, the one on the left doesn't have a hold switch thingie..
Not having a sleep/wake button doesn't magically make it 3G. Plus, I love that button my iPhone... they have no reason to take it out.
Again... it's a massively scaled down image.
Actually if you analyze the picture little more, you can see that the iPhone on the left (3G supposedly) has a non-shiny edge, defused look, like if it was made of "plastic".
I shrinked down the current iPhone to make it look as pixelated as the icon and it still had the shiny edge.
This might actually mean that it is in fact the rumored iPhone 3G new look.
Ah, but you took a full-size image and scaled it down. The illustrator program that created that vector image to begin with would have interpolated some details out of a low-res exported image for the sake of clarity, also a lot of those vectors would have been resized down to zero if it was resized as a vector.
While a matte bezel would be nice from a lack-of-scratches point of view, this is not proof positive. Nothing to see here . . . move along.
You guys are reading way, way, way too much into this. It is the standard iPhone. The only REAL difference is you can actually see the volume and vibrate switches on the icon, and you can't see the sleep/wake, while on the real phone pictured you can't see volume/vibe but can see sleep/wake.
That is to say, the picture of the "real" iPhone looks as different from the current iPhone as the icon does. They're identical, get over it.