iPhone and iPhone 3G comparison shot arrives, only one can emerge victorious
By Paul Miller 
posted June 24th 2008 11:07AM
posted June 24th 2008 11:07AM
posted June 24th 2008 11:07AM
A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Original iPhone all the way.
That new plastic one looks way too much like a Palm Centro yuck!
What are you talking about? It looks exactly like the first iPhone, the only difference is that the back is all black instead of just a black band at the bottom. It has to be plastic because of the addition of 3G and GPS, those signals don't pass through metal which is why the first iPhone has the plastic band at the bottom - for the antennas.
I didnt think the back of the first iPhone was actually metal though?
Yeah it's aluminum except the plastic band at the bottom.
But look! The back of the new one says "5mp video camera with autofocus"!
Oh wait...
wtf are you talking about, it looks nothing like a palm centro.
http://blog.treonauts.com/PalmCentroReview02.jpg
@ yode:
Why sure it does! It's black and has four rounded corners..
I prefer the original aesthetically, but im biased :D
I agree I prefer the aluminum look. But it was so slick that I kept it in a case. I am looking forward to getting my hands on a 3G.
I prefer the aluminum backing, but the glossy stuff looks better in these pictures. That's because they do look sexier out of the box. But a few fingerprints and glaring blemishes later, that aluminum looks much better.
No doubt apple was thinking the same thing, so we'd be all eager to buy the next phone when ours look all beaten up.
Yea, it's like downgrading a MBP to MB
With a plastic back on the 3G version, I wonder if over time the phone will start twisting and flexing, and possibly cause problems for users in the future.
I'm sure Apple did everything they can from a design point of view to keep the aluminum rear case, but I think the loss in 3G, GPS and signal speeds were simply not worth it.
Lets hope the pictures of the Black aren't doing it justice.
Black is much better. Hopefully more grippy too.
True, it won't matter much once it's in a case, but I think the 3G version will look better in a clear acrylic case. One thing I could never stand with the original iphone was how busy and crappy it looked from the back in a clear acrylic case. The black 3G one will lend itself to making an acrylic case more invisible, I think.
Doesn't really matter, though, as I'm going with a black Griffin Wave for mine.
It looks like it's still going to rip the hair out of your head though. It's that bezel...
Can't say I have ever had that experience
You're doing it wrong.
I think the old one looks a little classier but I like them both. One thing I can't argue with is what's inside the new one.
Plastic look so cheap I prefer the old iphone better
Wow now that I see them side by side, it's like they're two TOTALLY DIFFERENT PRODUCTS... without this careful analysis, I would never have realized that one was black and one was not.
So is the iTouch going to drop in price or what?
No, the new iPhone is subsidized. You end up paying a ton since you have a contract. The touch isn't so naturally its going to cost more initially
Plastic = better signal. Old iPhone's didn't have a great record for call quality. Hopefully this new design cures that
They need the plastic because, as what Zak said, the GPS and phone signals have to pass through plastic, not metal...
I actually like it.
no more weird bands and lips and headphone jacks that go in too far...
I think it will sell pretty good.
DON'T try to make your silver color on plastic, Apple!!!
If anyone has seen the 4GB SanDisk Sansa Clip they know what I'm talking about...
Silver plastic is REALLY ugly...
at least on CHEAP plastic..
I hope Apple uses high quality plastic.
Not cheap SanDisk plastic.
I didn't know SanDisk made plastic now..
how can that be. My razor is all metal. While it sucks for other reason call quality is not one of them. The signal get though just fine.
RAZR is NOT all metal. Look at the bottom piece on the back of the phone, it's plastic. I'm looking at mine right now.
They both look like crap.
So what you're saying is that you enjoy really ugly things, and horribly designed phones are attractive to you. You know instead of thinly veiling your hatred for Apple behind a snarky "iPhone is ugly" comment, why not just say you hate Apple? It would save everybody some time and we could just get it out of the way right up front.
@Zak
You don't have to "hate Apple" to dislike the looks of a large, extremely rounded off rectangle. I think they look like shit, too.
haha he said snarky
Argot recently told me that he considers the Palm III to be the gold standard for PDA design.
pochi, you're entitled to hate whatever you want, but seriously? Have you ever seen a phone made by anybody else? I'd like to see what what consider a "beautiful" phone if you seriously think the iPhone is ugly. Give me an example of a phone that looks good to you, I'm curious to see what design quirks appeal to you.
You’re low ranked because of your opinion; no one talks bad about apple products here. No opinions here buddy it’s a dictatorship....... An Apple fanboy dictatorship
Argot, you're missing about 4 letters from your name.
Those being R, O, A, and N.
@Zak
Well, if we're talking about giant rectangles, I think the LG Prada is far superior aesthetically. If we're talking standard candybar phones, I like the Nokia Prizm (that's a love/hate among a lot of people, but I really like it).
Sorry that giant rounded rectangles don't appeal to me, dude. I will try harder to skew my opinions to those that suit you and your fanboy goggles in the future.
@boss-hogg
Oh no, he's low ranked on a gadget blog! He deserves to be able to voice his opinion, and if he gets low ranked, he shouldn't care. It's a gadget blog, who cares if you are high or low ranked.
pochi - Why do you think the Prada is "far superior"? It has rounded edges just like the iPhone, a smaller screen than the iPhone and more wasted space around the screen, in addition to less usable buttons on the front. What *exactly* is "far superior" about it? Is it just because it's not made by Apple?
And yes, the Nokia Prizm is an abortion of a design. That's not even an opinion, it's a fact. But even that thing has rounded edges, so I'm not sure why you keep saying you don't like rounded edges, then provide examples of phones you like that have... rounded edges.
By even mentioning the Prizm you've shown us all that you have the design sense of a dead badger, and you wouldn't know good design if it gave you an atomic wedgie and stole your lunch money.
I love how there is an argument taking place over something that is extremely subjective.
@Zak
The Prada is superior because I think it looks much nicer and classier. I'm not really too concerned about convincing you that it looks better, because... well, I just don't give a shit what you think looks better.
"By even mentioning the Prizm you've shown us all that you have the design sense of a dead badger..."
No, you've just "shown us all" that you're unable to accept alternate opinions on design.
"...and you wouldn't know good design if it gave you an atomic wedgie and stole your lunch money."
I get the feeling you're probably more used to that than most people here. I guess wearing an Apple t-shirt to your 9th grade gym class will do that though, right Zak?
What about the HTC Diamond?
You guys didn't even mention it :(
Is it just me, or does the camera lens look a little bit larger on iPhone 3G?
I think there's just a little aluminum ring around it...
So what would happen if for example, Apple sells 30 million iphone to AT&T customers during the 5 year period & then decides to go with someone else? 30 millions is 1/2 of AT&T customers. I think this deal is suicide to Death Star, i mean the iphone side affects could be Fatal to them
i like the new one better but in white
the new one looks more like a phone to me than a smartphone, I do like the fact that the back is one piece though, didn't have to be plastic, and didn't have to be glossy, the matte plastic from the old iPhone's bottom would have been best imho, wouldn't look so cheap. even though I highly doubt it'll scratch all that much, my mighty mouse is still pretty scratch free (if I actually try to see scratches and put it under a lamp). Of course, it doesn't get carried around in my pocket every day, but it doesn't get handled that gently either.
Yeah your right they both look like crap, Im switching from my iPhone back to my old Primeco phone.
I worry that it's going to wobble while sitting on it's backside. That could be annoying, but who knows.
this is not as fun as playing spot the difference on the megatouch game at my local bar.