I briefly looked through the review on their site. I had to laugh at the irony that the pictures of the camera that they were reviewing, were so poorly taken.
How much credence can we give to a reviewer of cameras who can't even take a decent shot with their best efforts?
Yes, Jamie Harrison started reviewing at TR and often more than not, the images in the review seem to have a lot of compression artifacts and the reviews in general seem to be rushed. To compare, take Cliff Smith's (another TR camera reviewer) reviews.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I briefly looked through the review on their site. I had to laugh at the irony that the pictures of the camera that they were reviewing, were so poorly taken.
How much credence can we give to a reviewer of cameras who can't even take a decent shot with their best efforts?
Yes, Jamie Harrison started reviewing at TR and often more than not, the images in the review seem to have a lot of compression artifacts and the reviews in general seem to be rushed. To compare, take Cliff Smith's (another TR camera reviewer) reviews.
http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2008/02/19/Nikon-D300-Digital-SLR/