I can only honestly thing of ONE person I know that this would benefit. He only gets reception when his cell phone is placed in the window of his kitchen.
They should be giving these out for free! or at a low cost! $99 is fine but if they tag on a monthly fee... they are just asking for failure... Who is going to pay to get a carrier only to pay more to get signal for that carrier.
If, as several people below have suggested, that you only need to pay a monthly fee if you want unlimited calling, I'd happily pay a one-time $99 fee for the box to fix my reception problems at home.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I can only honestly thing of ONE person I know that this would benefit. He only gets reception when his cell phone is placed in the window of his kitchen.
ok.....
cool?
why doesn't att jump in on this band wagon?Then I would actually want to stay with them instead of wanting t switch to either verizon or tmobile.
They should be giving these out for free! or at a low cost! $99 is fine but if they tag on a monthly fee... they are just asking for failure... Who is going to pay to get a carrier only to pay more to get signal for that carrier.
If, as several people below have suggested, that you only need to pay a monthly fee if you want unlimited calling, I'd happily pay a one-time $99 fee for the box to fix my reception problems at home.