With 50 megapixels, you don't need a rover for space exploration... Just point this beast of a camera upwards and Martians will be complaining their privacy has been invaded.
haha KipHT, you do realise that DSLR means Digital SLR, i can only assume that you dont, oh and since when are film cameras rated by megapixels, maybe in some alternate universe or something, but not this one as far as i know.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
this could have amazing implications for space exploration, imagine a rover with this thing on it.
Props to you for thinking outside the box. Good show.
Or you could use a full-frame 6x6 film camera, which has more resolution, then scan it.
Oh wait, Nasa astronauts already do that. Or have they switched fully to digital? I doubt it.
They can't have high res cameras on a rover that transmit the data back in real time...the uplink is simply too slow.
So, nice fail.
With 50 megapixels, you don't need a rover for space exploration... Just point this beast of a camera upwards and Martians will be complaining their privacy has been invaded.
Yeah, because it's easy to take physical film out of a satellite/rover and process it.
I can totally see that working
haha KipHT, you do realise that DSLR means Digital SLR, i can only assume that you dont, oh and since when are film cameras rated by megapixels, maybe in some alternate universe or something, but not this one as far as i know.