Given the resolution on this thing is not even close to 1920 pixels across, this is not and will never be a 1080p capable monitor. Nice try, but that's not what the Vista stamp means (unless it means "capable of displaying software resized/downsized 1080p content," which would be purely stupid).
I fail to see the point of this resolution - go with a 17-19" screen which is natively 720p capable (1280 pixels wide) or spend a couple extra bucks for a 24" which is truly 1080p capable (1920 pixels wide).
What I really want is a reasonably priced 21-22" panel that is natively 1080p. There is an OEM for this (I forget which), but nothing really mainstream or competitively priced. Yet.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Given the resolution on this thing is not even close to 1920 pixels across, this is not and will never be a 1080p capable monitor. Nice try, but that's not what the Vista stamp means (unless it means "capable of displaying software resized/downsized 1080p content," which would be purely stupid).
I fail to see the point of this resolution - go with a 17-19" screen which is natively 720p capable (1280 pixels wide) or spend a couple extra bucks for a 24" which is truly 1080p capable (1920 pixels wide).
What I really want is a reasonably priced 21-22" panel that is natively 1080p. There is an OEM for this (I forget which), but nothing really mainstream or competitively priced. Yet.