Ridata Ultra-S Plus MLC SSDs arrive in 32/64/128GB flavors, start at $170
Ridata has dabbled in the wonderful world of triple-data capacity SSDs before, but as with most manufacturers, it wouldn't open its mouth and divulge a price. Now, however, we've got three newcomers to swoon over along with price tags to balk (or cheer, depending on wallet depth) over. The Ultra-S Plus MLC SATA SSD line has launched in 32GB, 64GB and 128GB sizes, all of which offer up to 128MB/sec read speeds and 80MB/sec write speeds. Without further adieu, the late July-bound trio will be selling for $169.90, $294.90 and $537.90 from least capacious to most. So, you gettin' one?























Here's hoping they make at least a 64GB SSD version of the next Archos and Cowon players
they can not because 99% of SSD are SATA and Archos are PATA
That's one good looking SSD!!!
yeah man- it's beautiful!
Your comment made me lol
I'm gonna wait to see how this compares to the new OCZ Core drives which are about the same price http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/01/ocz-reveals-core-series-sata-ii-2-5-ssds-128gb-for-479/ Which ever company comes out first gets my money ^_^
I had the same thought when I read this, but I am considering just waiting a little longer till the Nehalem takes hold and then build all fresh. Should be at least 1 more round of price drops in SSD by then.
If not then I may go with VelociRaptor for my desktop machine. Alot more space for the $$ with almost the same level of overall performance.
I simply can't buy into SSD until they start offering long term warranties for them.
Hard Disk drive failure is common in off-the-shelf pc's/laptops and I don't know what to expect from SSD drives. The technology will take a good 5 years to mature.
The technology is actually pretty old, it wasn't until the past year or so that it’s come down to consumer pricing levels though.
I hope you are joking. Furthermore, hdds using magnetic disks have lots of moving parts...SSDs not so much. Hence the SS aspect of the SSD - "solid-state". As a result, it's pretty safe to assume that SSDs are already more reliable than spinny drives.
When they reach 64gb for 179 dollars then they have a deal.
ditto, then I'll have two drives in my laptop, one ssd for system, and one hdd for storage (at least until ssds come down further in price)
These prices seem too good to be true.
Aren't these SSDs using cheaper technology than the expensive ones we've come to know and love? Like I heard these last less in terms of write cycles or something???
With any luck, in the next decade(s) or so, this will be the next "cheapo" upgrade and we'll be able to buy large capacity drives at low prices (think sub-$100 large-capacity HDs today)
Hey GUYS tigerdirect.com already start seling OCZ's Core SSD and they have in stock!
I think 32Gb is overpriced compared to 64gb. Meh.
YOU ALL BUY, and i'll wait for the price to drop from you guys buying
Well it seems that prices will hold back this technology a little longer. I would be curious to see what the profit margin is on these. In my opinion they need to trim off another couple hundred dollars off the top end drive.
i hope this isn't as bad as some of their flash drives. read the reviews of some of their compact flash drives. plus this is multi-layer.i wonder if it has wear-leveling. but it is cheap compared to other manufacturers. someone buy this and let me know how well it goes.
RiDATA SSD is the fastest so far! here is proof:
http://datamarck.com/benchmarks
I saw www.allstarshop.com is selling
128GB @ $475
64GB @ 257
32GB @169
lower than any of their competitors' price!
It's not clear that SSD are MORE RELIABLE than HDD. They are just LESS FRAGILE. That matters for laptops, not so for desktops.
All the other failure points are there, and a few extra ones. That includes electro-magnetism and write wearing
Give me price parity and I'll still use RAID1 with an SSD and an HDD.