Parrot offers up $450 Andrée Putman-designed digiframe
Remember that Andrée Putman-designed digital photo frame that was showcased in the UK earlier this year? Even if not, Parrot would like to remind you of this apparently exquisite device, which features commonplace luxuries like a 7-inch 720 x 480 resolution display, Bluetooth 2.0+EDR, an SD / MMC card slot, an undisclosed amount of internal memory and USB connectivity. Oh, and did we mention the $449.99 price? Yeah, there's that, too. Heard enough, haven't you? (Psst... it ships on July 28th in the US.)
[Via Digital Picture Frame Review]
[Via Digital Picture Frame Review]

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Philippe @ Jul 16th 2008 12:56PM
Are the tokens provided to play mega-checkers on the box?
Ryan Trevisol @ Jul 16th 2008 1:04PM
Let me see if I get this right, we've got a black digiframe with a large black matte around it and banded by . . . is that clear acrylic or stainless steel? And it took a famous designer to come up with that?
randy @ Jul 16th 2008 5:59PM
Famous?
jon @ Jul 16th 2008 1:24PM
I thought this look went out in the 80's...
bolezhinkov @ Jul 16th 2008 2:21PM
turns out the 80s are cool again, for all the kids that werent there to see how much they really did suck.
I know, its bumming me out as much as you.
Billy Gun @ Jul 16th 2008 1:41PM
Hooo My God! The world is getting so gay!
wrabbit @ Jul 16th 2008 5:13PM
15-year old kids making icons on sites like crystalxp, deviantart and wincustomize, come up with better looking frames than this.
Jon @ Jul 16th 2008 5:34PM
It seems like the designer aspect of this frame is not the frame but the design of the menus and programming. True the frame can do with some work but hey, you can just break it down and rebuild it how you want to no?
Jon @ Jul 16th 2008 5:25PM
QUESTION!!
Will it run Ubuntu?
NutMac @ Jul 16th 2008 5:56PM
Why not some features match the high-end price? 720x480 for $450? Only SD/MMC slot (what about SDHC, CF, MS)? No WiFi?
Michael Chastain @ Jul 16th 2008 8:02PM
Enough with the widescreen frames. They're annoying as hell in use--give me a 4:3 frame which matches my photo sizes.