Chinavasion's "world's thinnest" MP4 player just may be accurate in name
Chinavasion isn't known for offering up cutting-edge gadgetry -- far from it, to be honest -- but the MP4 player known only as the CVSJ-1304-4GB is actually fairly notable. According to the dodgy specifications, the $39.55 device checks in at just 4.5-millimeters thick, which is certainly thinner than the other so-called "world's thinnest" DAP. Of course, this may only be true due to the "MP4" moniker, seeing as most units not created and sold exclusively in China are called "MP3" players. Semantics aside, the unit also includes a 1.8-inch display with a 160 x 128 resolution, a curious 2.5-millimeter headphone jack, a USB 2.0 port and a rechargeable battery. So, do any of you have a competitor that's a hair thinner? Our hunch is yes.
[Via PMP Today]
[Via PMP Today]



















Whats the point of having a really thin pmp of it sucks.
I'm going to piggyback your first position to call engadgets bluff :P
http://www.mobilefun.co.uk/product/14993.htm
@ fanman
*Ahem*
"Credit Card MP3 Player - 2GB"
That is not an MP4 player (no screen or MP4 support).
so does that mean you don't have an ipod?
...who cares?
The 2.5-millimeter headphone jack ruins it for me, but the price is quite nice for a 4gb player.
you can get a 3.5" --> 2.5" converter for about 50 cents.
Even though you can get a converter, I'm with you. I'd rather not have to have a converter attached to it at all times, it's much nicer to just plug in any headphones straight to the MP3 player.
do they have to keep up with this naming scheme?
I make the world's thinnest MP7 player. Just waiting for the format to come into its own.
lol, ok.
I'm still waiting for an MP48 player that plays HHDDVVDDBVD's
let's see how many people get that
I give them props for that thinness, I mean I'm really wowed. Now, I never tried it, and I don't know how the thing works in the software and hardware level, so I ain't going to judge it just right now, but again, that is really thin and the product design looks amazing.
Now my friend's Zune 8 looks miserably fat!
the zune 8 is fat.
Also here are the full specs:
Memory: 4GB
Display:
Size: 1.8
Resolution: 160×128
Supported Formats: MP4, MP3, WMA, ASF, WAV
Bit rate: 32~320Kbps
FM Radio: 87.5-108Mhz
Built in MIC Record Format: WAV
Earphone Jack Output: 5mW + 5mW
Earphone Jack Size: 2.5mm
SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio): 75dB
Languages: English, Korean, French, German, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Czech, Danish, Polish, Russian, Turkish, Thai, Romanian, Greek and Hebrew
USB: 2.0 (1.1 Compatible)
System: Windows 98SE and Later, MAC OS 9.2 and Later
Power Source: Internal Lithium Ion Battery
Dimension: 85×54x4.5mm
God damnit! this looks impressing!!
I hope you're being sarcastic Saad Arabia, because that SNR is downright terrible. The price is good, I gotta give it that but I'd rather get something better for more money. I don't know why people want everything thinner and thinner. In my opinion certain items have really crossed the line where their thinness makes them uncomfortable to hold and use (thin cell phones for example).
man 5mW per channel? even my tiny cowon U2 does 13mW!!!
god you probably cant even hear it in NYC unless you have a pair of Shure E5cs.
actually, almost every dap e.g. ipod, sanza, zen, and zune are created in china.
where can i buy this thing?
Chinavasion MP4 player
(Made in U.S.A.)
We have the cheap labor now with all the Mexicans
No wonder it's so small, my 4 year old cellphone has a bigger screen and better resolution than that...
System: Windows 98SE and Later, MAC OS 9.2 and Lat
Windows 98SE?
lol so i assume it supports even way back to win98se... wow....
Win98SE is a pretty common minimum system requirement for drag-and-drop USB storage devices.
God I hate the "MP4" moniker. It means NOTHING. It doesn't say what resolution video plays at, what video codec, what audio codec, what container, what profile. NOTHING. I can produce a dozen MP4 videos in a variety of profiles and formats and I guarantee that none of them will play.
I wish that a standards body would adopt and mandate some extremely straightforward profiles with recognizable logos to cover portable devices and home cinema devices. The current situation is a complete mess.
When companies finally go for the "world's sturdiest DAP" I might pay attention. I don't want to have a broken player when I drop it the first time.
The Kate Moss of Mp3 players