Autosub6000 to explore deep undersea volcanoes as only a robot could
By Ryan Block 
posted Aug 10th 2008 7:26PM
posted Aug 10th 2008 7:26PM
posted Aug 10th 2008 7:26PM
Estimated time drivers save by using real-time GPS traffic updates
Drivers that use GPS systems with real-time traffic info spend 18% less time behind the wheel than those who do not.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Full speed ahead, Mr. Parker, full speed ahead!
fantastic. until it sabatoges the volcano and blows us all up.
i for one do not welcome our volcano probing overlords.
"There is hope for the future.... And when the world is ready for a new and better life, all this will someday come to pass... In God's good time."
I, for one, welcome our new, under-sea, volcano exploring overlords.
i see what you did there
Did you see it the last 800 times as well?
also, despite the oxymoron, shouldn't it be underlords
with them being quite alot lower than us and all, like 20'000ft is pretty insane...
Seems to me that if it's exploring underwater volcanoes it could repower itself from geothermal energy. Cmon scientists try harder.
Cmon governments increase research budgets
cant get energy from heat when its hot all around you.
Looks like an orange nuke
"And you know how we feel about unsupervised self-directing machines."
I have a feeling that there was supposed to be a link there :-)
"It has a range of 1,000 kilometers, thanks to its lithium polymer battery packs."
Umm, that's a lot more than a kilometer. Like a thousand times more.
i knew that sounded like a really short distance. pretty big error there.
Can we put THOSE in a car? Thanks.
I didn't understand why it was capable of going 20k ft down when it could only travel 1 click at a time.
Now it all makes sense.
Exploring volcanoes eh? Must be made of Dolomite
Only 40%.
Looks more like a torpedo
Crap ICBMs planted in volcanoes.
The max depth on this thing (6,000m) isn't really that impressive. The HROV at WHOI goes something like 13,000m down. Heck, Hydroid makes a production vehicle that does 6,000. And if you look at their spec pdf, that range is at 1m/s (>2 knots (slow even by AUV standards)), and it says underneath it "The 2007 version will have 50% of this range.". The range is pretty impressive, but other than that I can't really see what all the fuss is about. There are vehicles that go deeper and do more, and are doing more interesting stuff. Sounds like the BBC doing its best to make the UK look as scientifically significant as possible. Now, the way they use individually pressure compensated battery cells to avoid a big tube is impressive, but Engadet seems to miss that completely, just doing the link to the shitty blog and not really bothering to understand what's going on.
"The max depth on this thing (6,000m) isn't really that impressive."
True
"The HROV at WHOI goes something like 13,000m down."
Yes, but they'll have to dig a 2000 m hole in the Mariana Trench to test do so.
Engadget glosses over this thing because there is no iphone or EEE PC involved. Get with the program. Even their own link shows the range to be 1000km, not 1 km. Only off by a little there. But without an apple logo or ogg support, they couldn't be bothered. Not a word about battery or motor type, lighting, cameras or any sensors that may be onboard.
yeah, true the Mariana trench is only about 11k deep. Poor choice of wording on my part. The HROV is supposedly rated higher, but yeah after 11k everything extra is just to add to the margins, and the FOS on these things can be lower than you'd expect.
yeah, they rate it to 11,000. forget what I said.
Ryan, in TFA they use SI units, why don't you leave it that way? Alternatively, convert both units.
6000 meter = ~1140 rods
1 kilometer = ~1350 double remen
It is the National Oceanography CENTRE in Southampton, not "Center".
This is a name and as such should be spelled as is. "Pearl Harbor" is never "Pearl Harbour" for the same reason.