Criterion Collection uses PS3 as reference Blu-ray player
Yeah, you read that correctly -- the obsessive audiophiles / videophiles at the Criterion Collection use Sony's PlayStation 3 as its reference Blu-ray player. In all honesty, we can't say we're too surprised. Time and again, Sony's latest console has been rated very highly as a dedicated BD deck, and the plentiful firmware updates ensure that it's always at the forefront of whatever interactive functionality is next. This snippet of factual goodness was extracted from a recent writeup that took an in-depth look at how the CC would be revamping its home theater, and even famed calibration guru Joe Kane gave his approval at using the console for playing back Blu-ray Discs. The real kicker? They also settled upon a DVIGear HDMI cable over one of those obscenely overpriced Ogre cables -- and that was after running clean out of coat hangers.
[Via CNET]
[Via CNET]
























Or their problem.
I love my PS3. Why does Sony make crappy Blu-ray players for more $$? To get more people to buy a PS3 and overtake 360 sales.
So sad that the reference blu-ray player is a PS3, what a joke. To this day not a single stand alone unit has gotten it right like the XA2 did for HD DVD.
Very true. No flagship player. Sony really dropped the ball on that one. They did DVD right with the DVP-S7000. They did SACD right with the SCD-1. I have both. But I guess it's a blessing in disguise. I paid $600 for my PS3 Christmas 2006 and it still is the best player. Dirt cheap if you ask me for a launch player.
Um, wrong. PS3 IS the flagship player. Supports every feature of Blu-Ray perfectly. Easily upgradable and future-proof. Upscales DVDs very nicely and passes all Silicon Optix HQV upscaling tests. Oh, and it also plays games, browses the web, and functions as a media center with at minimum a 20gb hard drive. And it retails at $400 vs. the $999 MSRP for the XA2.
So what was it you were saying about no flagship player again??
I like Pancakes
The PS3 is also a VERY good upconverting DVD player. It's nearly just as good as my old Oppo DVD player. Maybe even better. I don't know how this could be, but it is. I've compared the Oppo and PS3 to several under $100 DVD players and the cheap units just can't compare. The Ps3 is also great for older lower quality DVDs, same as the Oppo players. I have the OPDV971H. I use this over the PS3 just due to the energy savings. Strange, I know, but my DVD player is on hours a day.
I just said I like pancakes, geeezzzz. Oh yeah with maple syrup too
I am a fan of french toast But i respect your pancake choice
well how about french pancakes? Called CREPES! FTW i must say.
This will be great in justifying my purchase of one when GT5 comes out. :)
While the PS3 may be considered one of the better Blu-ray players now and its ability to upgrade is nice. I will stick with standalone players which now will get you better feature rich and a more home theaternomic unit, ala Panasonic BD50.
With more companies releasing players and these companies releasing a wider range of players, prices will be coming down on these better players to make them a better value than the PS3. The PS3 may have kicked of the first phase of Blu-ray, but it will be left in the dust as better and better players make their way to the market.
I am looking forward to being able to purchase a actual high end player from Denon, Pioneer or Oppo a little down the road for what they should actually be going for.
I'm a self proclaimed 360 Fanboy but I have to admit that I have a PS3 (Came with our 58" TV) and it is the absolute best DVD/Blu Ray/HD DVD player I have ever used. In the words of Apple, "It just works."
PS3 doesn't play HD-DVD.
...in all fairness, it's probably good to mention that they're using a $3,500+ video processor (with upgrades) to clean up the signal from the PS3.
http://www.anchorbaytech.com/products/systems/vp50pro.php
This is true. It's also true that 99.9% of Blu-Ray discs being natively 1080p would not require any post-processing. The external video processor would primarily be there for use with TV or DVD.
I'm not that familiar with processors but, I read some of the specs.
"PReP™
Progressive Reprocessing of 480p, 576p, and 1080p input signals allows poor deinterlacing of any source to be undone and done correctly using Precision Deinterlacing™
Precision Video Scaling II™
10-bit Scaling with Enhanced Sharpness Control up to 1080p
Progressive Cadence Detection™
Enables 24/48/72Hz and 25/50/75Hz output from film-based content at 480p, 576p, 720p and 1080p resolutions
Precision Gamma Correction™- Individual R/G/B Adjustments
Precision AV LipSync™
intelligent digital audio delay technology to match Audio & Video timing"
I'm just assuming... I'm sure that the PS3 benefits at least a little from those. I get what you're saying though... It's an uncompressed signal so it wouldn't require much filtering.
I resisted getting the PS3 because I'm really not a gamer. However, the thing is amazing. DVD upscaling is beautiful, and as a side bonus, the thing is an amazing CD player (plus SACD if you have an older model). I am hearing my entire CD collection like I've never heard it before. I highly recommend getting it, and if you don't have an amp, try out the Sony 5300ES.
Okay so which PS3? 40 GB or 80 GB??