On the original test, the iPhone loaded the page in 35 seconds. In the "debunk" test, the Bold loaded the page in 59 seconds. That's still a difference of 24 seconds! And the page was viewable (thus somewhat usable) on the iPhone (though not fully loaded) very quickly, while the Bold provided nothing but a blank white screen for 30 seconds.
The new video does nothing to "debunk" the test other than to prove the Bold is slightly less sucky at Web browsing than originally shown.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Not that much faster???
On the original test, the iPhone loaded the page in 35 seconds. In the "debunk" test, the Bold loaded the page in 59 seconds. That's still a difference of 24 seconds! And the page was viewable (thus somewhat usable) on the iPhone (though not fully loaded) very quickly, while the Bold provided nothing but a blank white screen for 30 seconds.
The new video does nothing to "debunk" the test other than to prove the Bold is slightly less sucky at Web browsing than originally shown.
"Bastard fanboys" indeed.